Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao vs. Bradley: WBO's Investigation Documents

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Dominicano Soy View Post
    Round 7 is the only round that could have been scored even in my opinion.
    All I keep hearing is the "rounds were close, coulda gone either way, etc"

    Yet theres only 1 close round? Makes no sense

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
      After the June 9th's controversial fight between Manny Pacquiao and Timothy Bradley, the World Boxing Organization put together a panel of indepedent judges to examine Bradley's twelve round split decision victor to capture the WBO's welterweight crown. In the documents posted below, you will find the 5 scorecards of the 5 WBO judges, along with the official scorecards of the fight. You will also find a round by round analysis comparing: 1.) where the WBO judges were in total agreement and where they were divided, 2.) where were all 8 judges (5 WBO judges and the three official judges) in total agreement, majority agreement, or divided.

      [Click Here To Read More]
      How the hell did 3 of the 5 judges give Pac round 7...omg ...

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Russian Crushin View Post
        All I keep hearing is the "rounds were close, coulda gone either way, etc"

        Yet theres only 1 close round? Makes no sense
        Had a lot of close but clear rounds, can't think of a round that was closer than 7.

        Comment


        • #24
          One of the W.B.O. judges gave Bradley the 4th round?! That was the most clear cut round of the entire fight! Of all the official and unofficial judges, NOBOBY gave Tim round 4!

          Comment


          • #25
            This proves that even watching the fight replay, judges will differ on there scores. Take into account that the judges on fight night didnt get HBO replays during the fight. I think Pac won but not by the margin lederman had it.

            Comment


            • #26
              Seriously move on everybody. This is all one huge waste of time. They werent gonna strip Bradley, nobody was going to overturn the decision. Nothing was gonna happen

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Albeerto View Post
                LMFAO... tell us something we dont know!!! Why didnt they do this for Abril-bum mum Rios? Cuz its pac the sky is falling. Lol
                Because it WASNT sanction by WBO

                Comment


                • #28
                  Between 3 American Judges, and 5 Independent Judges whom are you gonna believe?

                  Let the Investigation proceeds immediately.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Albeerto View Post
                    LMFAO... tell us something we dont know!!! Why didnt they do this for Abril-bum mum Rios? Cuz its pac the sky is falling. Lol
                    Exactly why didn't arum reacted like that with abril not only why no one even made a big fuss about campillo vs cloud that was the more clear win. I dont agree with robberies or bad decisions in boxing but when it happens to unknowns in boxing who are good and want to get recognition it pisses me off cause that decision can change their lifes.

                    For example campillo and abril. I had pac winning 8-6 or 8-5 rounds not like ledderman i hate that guy he is so biased.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by mercadojglb View Post
                      If Bradley would have won but got robbed no one would care about it and there would be no investigation. Only Pac and Mayweather are allowed to get investigations. I don't understand this shyt...the WBO already stated that they would not stripped Bradley.
                      When was the last time Floyd beat up a guy and got robbed?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP