Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao vs. Bradley: WBO's Investigation Documents

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    If Bradley, then he is now the new face of boxing. He should translate his name $$$$$. Can he?

    Comment


    • #62
      Comprehensive evaluation of the whole thing. I had it 8-4 to Pacquiao.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by mathed View Post
        Just because it appears that something landed, doesn't mean that it really did. Just because the crowd yells and screams, it doesn't mean it is a reflection of what truly happened. If someone takes over 200 shots from Manny Pacquiao, they are going to look like Cotto and Margs did, Bradley looked like he barely took any damage.
        You make a good point in the beginning of this statement then just completely contradict yourself with the last sentence.

        Some fighters just have really tough skin, and others bruise and cut easily. Just because someone's face isn't messed up doesn't mean they didn't take a lot of punches. I'm not trying to defend Compubox but judging punches landed based on facial damage isn't a good way to go.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by mathed View Post
          Nah man, it shows how the HBO crew were giving Pac credit for shots he missed, and how Tim was sticking Manny right and left but no one wanted or was able to see the truth. I had Pac winning by 2 rounds, that 10-2 stuff was nonsense. This just goes to show you that if the HBO "expert" analysts thought they saw something that wasn't really happening, then the human compubox operators can and are likely just as faulty and incompetent.

          Just because it appears that something landed, doesn't mean that it really did. Just because the crowd yells and screams, it doesn't mean it is a reflection of what truly happened. If someone takes over 200 shots from Manny Pacquiao, they are going to look like Cotto and Margs did, Bradley looked like he barely took any damage.

          Manny was taking most of the rounds off too man....you don't win rounds by coasting.

          My main point is that Lampley doesn't really know shizzle. I can admit that I thought Pac took the fight, but not the way most are saying he did and not by the amount that people are saying he did.
          Anyone who saw it a win by Bradley should go back to watching amateur boxing and leave professional boxing to us grown ups... How in the hell can someone who just moves around in the ring so much and throws multi-combos to the AIR can win a match... Yes Manny threw less punches but he made sure that if ever they connected it will be meaningful, did you all even saw atleast one meaningful punch from Bradley??!! And the match doesn't stop in 2min 30sec, you have to score it the entire 3minutes, Bradley may have been throwing 60-80 punches in the air, arms and gloves the entire match, but Manny even though threw lesser connected with 4-5 more meaningful/convincing punches, even if it's done in the last 30 seconds should get the nod.... Just by comparison, Floyd against Cotto was 26% in total punches, 179 connected punches out of 687 thrown. While Manny with Bradley was 34% in total punches, 253 connected punches out of 751 thrown. But still you saw only Floyd dominating Cotto, how double-standard can you get, just because Floyd moves a lot slicker, more fluid than Cotto you all tend to see it as a dominating performance by Floyd only... And Bradley moving a lot better than Manny, and Manny being awkward as he always is tends to give your un-trained eyes the perception that Bradley was putting up a great performance, but what he is doing really is just double-triple jabbing to the air... And to the one who said Bradley controlled the fight with his jab is downright laughable, Bradley threw a total of 449 jabs the entire fight and got in only 51 (11 percent), while Pacquiao connected with 63 out of 258 thrown jabs (24 percent)... I know the busier the boxer, the more it should impress the judges, but it should also somehow connect with his opponent... Just an example of Calzaghe winning more rounds against Hopkins because of sheer work rate, but Calzaghe as feather fisted as he is, atleast connected on Hopkins with his pitty-pat punches...... I didn't realize it is much more easier to go to professional boxing now, i just need to punch the air for three minutes of every round and i will win a championship belt!!!

          Manny connected 276 power punches out of 560 thrown against Cotto, 49%... he was connecting 411 out of 713 against Margarito, 58%... he was 177 out of 353 against Mosley, 50%... and Manny was 190 out of 493 against Bradley, that's 39%... The big difference, in the previous three fights Manny was connecting better with his power-combos, while in the Bradley match he was doing only 1 or 1-2 power punches. Manny cuts his opponents with accumulated power punches....

          Comment


          • #65
            ..YOu are right!!!Boxing is dead! Pac should walk away leave boxing to all the BUMS and Idiots of boxing. I am done with boxing!!!
            Originally posted by freudianslip View Post
            Cool story , everyone already knows Pacquiao should have won the fight. What good does this do if no decision will be over turned and they don't do this every time there is a clear robbery? Nothing. Step it up boxing.

            Comment

            Working...
            X
            TOP