Comments Thread For: No Reward for Robbery: BScene Pound-for-Pound Update

[DE100]

Who scored Mayweather-Cotto 115-113?

The writer of this P4P article. No wonder Mayweather cant move up when in the writers mind Mayweather almost lose his last fight.

[Frogs!]

Must be good being one of these type of writers, where you dont have to defend anything you write.

wrong.

cliff is always willing and able to defend what he writes.

matter of fact, he just did it again in very this thread.


maybe you should respond to him so we can find out whether you can defend what you write.

[Primera]

wrong.

cliff is always willing and able to defend what he writes.

matter of fact, he just did it again in very this thread.


maybe you should respond to him so we can find out whether you can defend what you write.

wrong, 3/4's of boxingscene's members disagree with this horrendous p4p list.

I guess it doesn't really matter though when boxrec, espn, yahoo sports, examiner, ringmag etc have him at #1

[BoxingGenius27]

The writer of this P4P article. No wonder Mayweather cant move up when in the writers mind Mayweather almost lose his last fight.

Cliff and I have disagreed before.

I disagree with this latest article of his.

I disagree that he thought Pac won FOTD, even though Mayweather was considered the better fighter for the majority of the decade.

And I definitely disagree that Mayweather was "EVER" in danger of losing his last fight.

But one thing about Cliff is if you ask, he will explain his reasoning behind it. Which is more than I get out of other writers. So he gets points in my book for it.

[Frogs!]

wrong, 3/4's of boxingscene's members disagree with this horrendous p4p list.

I guess it doesn't really matter though when boxrec, espn, yahoo sports, examiner, ringmag etc have him at #1

ummmmy post wasn't about de100 disagreeing with cliff since it's pretty obvious a lot of ppl will.

it was about him saying 'it must be good to be one of these writers since they don't have to defend what they write'.

see the difference?

[Primera]

ummmmy post wasn't about de100 disagreeing with cliff since it's pretty obvious a lot of ppl will.

it was about him saying 'it must be good to be one of these writers since they don't have to defend what they write'.

see the difference?

And what was his exact reasoning for putting a shot p4p loser at #1?

[BoxingGenius27]

@ Primera

Lol Cliff thinks Pac beat JMM 7 rounds to 5 and he thinks Pac beat Bradley > Mayweather beating Ortiz and Cotto.

[Primera]

that's just sad

well I did hear a rumor about this forum being powered by Top rank.

oh well i still love it

[Frogs!]

And what was his exact reasoning for putting a shot p4p loser at #1?

ask him yourself.

i'm pretty certain he'll oblige.

[EAAE]

haha it wasnt bad enough Pac was #1 before, but to keep him there after his last few performances is just a joke to boxing, and before u start *******s i know, blah blah blah