If Compubox was ran by a super computer with A.I that couldn't be bought, and had multiple hd 1000fps cameras around the ring that could detect every punch landed/evaded and even had FACIAL recognition software to detect if a fighter wince's in pain after being hit, it is still 1/4th of the **** that should be considered when judging a round
You judge who won a round based off of
Clean punching
Effective Aggressiveness
Defense
Ring Generalship
A perfect Compubox can only count Clean Punching. It does not tally up how many punches were slipped, you cannot put Ring Generalship in a hit/landed percentage, and Effective Aggressiveness is a very subjective term. The definition is moving forward effectively, but does that mean fighters who move backwards( Muhammad Ali) always lose in the category. I have always thought of it as just being effective regardless of what your game plan is.
My point is enough with these ****** Compubox threads, you do NOT judge a round by who landed more punches. SD12
You judge who won a round based off of
Clean punching
Effective Aggressiveness
Defense
Ring Generalship
A perfect Compubox can only count Clean Punching. It does not tally up how many punches were slipped, you cannot put Ring Generalship in a hit/landed percentage, and Effective Aggressiveness is a very subjective term. The definition is moving forward effectively, but does that mean fighters who move backwards( Muhammad Ali) always lose in the category. I have always thought of it as just being effective regardless of what your game plan is.
My point is enough with these ****** Compubox threads, you do NOT judge a round by who landed more punches. SD12

Comment