Tweet
good article,please no rematch pacman won ,I dont want to see no endless boring 24-7s and a 6month buildup to a reamtch do jmm 4 or mayweather screw a rematch ,pacs record isnt clean anyhow,and he did lose to JMM the last time so just move on.It wasnt even a competetive matchup for there to be a rematch.....
-
-
I don't buy that *****e either... Two of the three judges gave Pacquiao 1 out of the last 6 round, and the third judge gave him 2.
This is corruption taking place in the most corrupt city in the world, and Bob Arum is directly involved.
Arum is not giving Mayweather a payday that will be twice that of which he would make against anyone else in the world other than Pacquiao.
A Bradley re-match will be marketed to the hilt, and will do good PPV numbers, with Bob keepeing all that money in-house.
Manny takes home something like 38-42% of his purse, and I'm sure Bradley has a similar deal - Does anyone really think Bob is gonna let Floyd make more than him on the so-called "Fight of the Century"? Think people, think.
Last weekend was a rigged game in a city that survives/thrives on rigged gaming.Comment
-
pac needs to leave arum asap and either sign with gbp or go independent
like floyd has
manny is a superstar, no way he needs arums dumbassComment
-
Schaefer was right on. Pac really nothing to prove in a rematch.
But I disagree about blaming the judges' bad decisions on their old age.
A blind man could have seen Pac winning at least 8-9 rounds.Comment
-
Schaefer just took one giant dump on Bob Arum.
Arum can't do anything, no point coming out in the media saying 'im outraged'. Everyone knows he's a lying SOB.
All GBP have to do now is promote themselves as bastions of fairness and respectability for the sport of boxing and they have won the war with Top Rank.Comment
-
Schaefer's sleazy comment.
I'm a little surprised that Schaefer was able to accurately repeat the first part of Arum's comment, but in repeating the second part, took it completely out of context. Deliberately so and showed lots of SLEAZE.
If he's continued on it would have read ".....make lots of money. (in the rematch) But who's going to take this sport seriously" This was the full comment reported with the writer's addition of (in the rematch). Without that little extra, he could have been referring to all the money which is on it's way into the kitty. Much of which, as we ALL know but always neglect to mention, will be paid out to the main event boxers, Pacquiao and Bradley.Last edited by edgarg; 06-11-2012, 06:46 PM.Comment
-
I hate to say this, but the sport of boxing will be much better off when Bob croaks over. I hope he reads this too. This idiot has put a bad spell on the sport we love. All his cards suck too. The only good fight to be on saturday turned sour when that idiot Rojas threw an illegal punch.Comment
-
What you really meant to say Jimmy McNutty, was "I'm outraged, everybody knows he's a lying S.O.B." all in one sentence, and exactly describing Schaefer who deliberately took Arum's comment out of context and didn't complete it, which would have shown that Arum was not only disgusted but saying that what the hell difference does it make that he'd make money out of it, when the sport of boxing itself will suffer...
Jimmy, be a little more careful- more honest...like.Comment
-
Schaefer accurately reporting Arums real comment and intent
"As Bob said, this is not about Bob Arum making a lot of money, this is about the sport". Schaefer's accidentally accurate reporting of what Arum REALLY said and meant.
Isn't is strange that these large scale liars and twisters, so often make mistakes and contradict themselves, thus allowing the REAL FACTS to acciddentally come out, theopposite effect of what they were intending.
That comment was near the end of the whole interview, and then just before the finish Schaefer again turns it around and contradicts it, with his original lie.
There guys have a tough time trying to keep all their lies in order.Comment
Comment