Comments Thread For: Schaefer on Pacquiao's Loss, Jabs Arum, Rips The Rematch
Collapse
-
The rematch should happen, Pacquiao should have won and in a rematch he gets the chance to beat Bradley officially. We can say Pacquiao won but for him to get more credit it should go on his record, we know Pacquiao won but there are some ignorant People who don't look into things.
Pacquiao deserves the rematch with Bradley don't worry about Arum, look at it from Pacquiao's perspective he beat Bradley but got robbed Pacquiao will wanna get that winComment
-
-
maybe its the money arum owes mayweather for the zab judah and gatti fights thats makes him want more of the cut?Comment
-
Edgargler is here once again to defend the honor of honest arum. U r pathetic n now a mere joke around this board. Another transparent attempt to twist facts to suit ur idols agendaI'm a little surprised that Schaefer was able to accurately repeat the first part of Arum's comment, but in repeating the second part, took it completely out of context. Deliberately so and showed lots of SLEAZE.
If he's continued on it would have read ".....make lots of money. (in the rematch) But who's going to take this sport seriously" This was the full comment reported with the writer's addition of (in the rematch). Without that little extra, he could have been referring to all the money which is on it's way into the kitty. Much of which, as we ALL know but always neglect to mention, will be paid out to the main event boxers, Pacquiao and Bradley.Comment
-
You're talking condensed nonsense. This is a tired old canard. Top Rank/Arum doesn't owe Mayweather a cent. If they did, don't you think that Mayweather would be screaming the house down and taking Top Rank to court. He occasionally mentions it but always backs off when questioned.
Arum and other Top Rank people have been asked about this several times, and their answer, which is entirely believable, is this; "We did owe him money and were paying it off in payments. When we realised that he owed us much more, we immediately stopped paying, but 98% had been paid. We didn't bother to reclaim anything because the legal expenses would make it not worth it." I may be paraphrasing a bit but that's what they've said repeatedly.Comment
-
Your scalpel is pretty blunt doctor......Instead of calling names and making pseudo "jokes" why not actually read what I wrote and look at the original Schaefer quote...when you will see that I am entirely accurate. I don't believe that there's a single point wrong.
And my name was actually Edgar G. I had a computer glitch which caused the contraction. What difference?? Look at your own name...if you can bear the sight....
I suppose your MDMPH stands for "Muddy(thinking) Murphy"....Why don't you write decent English, with proper capitals on the correct words. Why you take pride in your illiteracy is beyond normal thinking people.Comment
Comment