Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why Did Prince Naseem Quit After Barrera?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Uns View Post
    Do some research. Naz had one more, but lost it and then retired.

    Watch Little Prince, Big Fight on Youtube. You can see his sparring wasn't that good and they were living the life, his team were playing pool and laughing at Barerra training up in the cold mountains while Naz was down there in the warmth.

    Anyway watch that documentary and tell me Naz was hungry.
    Originally posted by D-MiZe View Post
    A lot was happening outside the ring and it clearly effected him in the ring. Even if he had've won, the old Naz was gone before the fight happened.





    He also changed trainer prior to the fight.
    Originally posted by Ray* View Post
    The man was more bothered about his hair than the fight, He was done way before Barrera, Barrera made sure he would never come back.
    Originally posted by Ray* View Post
    Seriously people are NOW overrating Barrera's win over Naz, He outclass Naz by fighting him on the outside, boxing him and tying him up, He respect Naz's power and you can see in the way he fought naz, He probably got hit a couple of times with power-shots because he didnt want to engage Naz like he did Morales, So to see this "Barrera took his soul" myth shows how people don't really know much about boxing, they just jump on the bandwagon of what to say and run with it.
    Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
    Hatton won most of his fights outside Britain (6 of 8) he only lost to two PFP #1 fighters and one of them under questionable officiating.
    Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
    Hamed has already revealed why he quit - he lost his punching power.



    Can we put it to bed now?
    Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
    No, let's not do that. Instead of listening to the man himself, let's make up reasons that suit our own bias.


    notice how every single poster that defended hamed is a brit?

    yea & im biased.


    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by shinya aoki
      and you don't think hamed isn't bias? how ****** are you?
      Wtf are you talking about? he answered a factual question on his career and his life, bias on his part doesn't come into it.

      You can claim he's lying and your made up reasons are the real reasons, if that's what you choose to do then knock yourself out and have fun with it. I'll stick to the fighter's own word.
      Last edited by Weebler I; 06-07-2012, 02:41 PM.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
        Wtf are you talking about? he answered a factual question on his career and his life, bias on his part doesn't come into it.

        You can claim he's lying and your made up reasons are the real reasons, if that's what you choose to do then knock yourself out and have fun with it. I'll stick to the fighter's own word.
        Yeah, like the Princess is going to come out and admit he was really a fraud.....even though it's the truth. Of course he's going to make excuses.

        Poet

        Comment


        • #44
          Reason is this, Hamed was shook after Barrea. Hamed started to think he was this elite fighter who can clown and KO people with ease and that no one can truly take his power. ENTER Barrea, Barrea was looked at as elite but the bottom the elite, so they took the fight Thinking he will be easy to catch and KO since Barrea like to engage. What happened was Barrea didnt engage and boxed and took away Hamed only chance to win and was his power. YOu see hamed in that fight smiling, shaking his head every time he went back to the corner. He was in disbelief that he can land. HE knew the competition on gets harder after that. So he took one more fight so he can set up his excuse on why he retired, instead of having the moniker of Barrea retired him.

          Wasnt a bullied fight where he got outclassed and whooped, he just got exposed to himself that his power cant help him in the fight.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
            Wtf are you talking about? he answered a factual question on his career and his life, bias on his part doesn't come into it.

            You can claim he's lying and your made up reasons are the real reasons, if that's what you choose to do then knock yourself out and have fun with it. I'll stick to the fighter's own word.

            Barerra was Hamed's greatest opponent to date. The fight was in the mecca of boxing las vegas. Hamed's first visit there. You add his ridiculous & utterly conceited ****** entrance celebration & you're going to tell me the reason why he lost was because he wasnt motivated enough?




            Only delusional dishonest nationalistic ******s would believe such a thing.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Rassclot View Post
              Seriously, that beating was not even that bad. Barrera won by 3-4 rounds. wow. big deal.


              Did Barrera expose something else that wasn't talked about in public?

              Honestly, the entire fight was bizaare. I'll let you know why. Barrera REQUESTED NEW GLOVES, the commission approved Barrera's request and they were flown in last minute.

              Naseem looked clearly truly bothered coming into the ring. He didn't do the usual flip over the top rope as if he already knew his schtick had been exposed.

              In that fight Naseem did not demonstrate the level of punching power seen in his entire career despite landing numerous seemingly flush shots on Barrera. He never even fazed Barrera.
              Naz did have 1 last fight which he won,im no naz fan but he did face some stiff opposition and he carried a tremendous punch for a little guy his defended his title 15 times which puts him 17th in the category of most title defences thru out the history of the sport,that in itself is quite an achievement,i think nazs hands were becoming a big problem for him in the later part of his career they say after his fights theyd cut the glove off because his hands were so swollen,i think that combined with his character and wealth he just walked away and rightly so,barreras a beast no doubt thru legend but i really believe a motivated naz would have done alot better that night he underestimated the babyface and paid the price.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by DTMB View Post
                Barerra was Hamed's greatest opponent to date. The fight was in the mecca of boxing las vegas. Hamed's first visit there. You add his ridiculous & utterly conceited ****** entrance celebration & you're going to tell me the reason why he lost was because he wasnt motivated enough?




                Only delusional dishonest nationalistic ******s would believe such a thing.
                It wasn't me who said that. Hamed was on the slide professionally but was beaten by a better boxer on the night.

                The thread is about why he retired, but he didn't quit after Barrera, he won another title and beat Calvo.

                It was clear though he had lost the thing that made him special, his power.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by DTMB View Post
                  Barerra was Hamed's greatest opponent to date. The fight was in the mecca of boxing las vegas. Hamed's first visit there. You add his ridiculous & utterly conceited ****** entrance celebration & you're going to tell me the reason why he lost was because he wasnt motivated enough?




                  Only delusional dishonest nationalistic ******s would believe such a thing.
                  ..........

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by mexiking View Post
                    Because he realized that boxing outside of Britain, is a different level of talent! (I.E Ricky Hatton)
                    I think its unfair when people talk about Ricky Hatton that way. He lost to Pacquiao and Mayweather, two all time greats, there's no shame in that.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by DTMB View Post
                      notice how every single poster that defended hamed is a brit?

                      yea & im biased.


                      Defend Naz? Yea ok, more like people overrating Barrera's win over the overrated Naz...The same Barrera that show enough respect to the overrated Naz by boxing him and refusing to engage him in any war, I dont need to defend anything, I don't give a toss what nationality any boxer is, But this myth of Barrera destorying Naz or retiring Naz is laughable, Naz was done way>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before he even step in the ring with Barrera, You can only see this if you follow boxing back then, Not following bandwagons now.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP