From 2005 to 2009 who had a tougher run than Jermain Taylor?

[-Kev-]

Wasn't that AFTER you said I was a "bias Brit"? Because if I don't find Chad Dawson exciting to watch, that OBVIOUSLY means I find Audley Harrison edge-of-the-seat viewing.

Just like your thread on B-Hop, all you do is criticize American fighters.

Can you point me to a thread of yours where you made fun of David Haye's toe injury, Amir Khan's KO loss to Prescott[or Amir Khan currently whining like a b-tch], any thread making fun of a Brit.

If you can do that, then I will leave you alone about being bias to Brits.

[-Kev-]

The butthurt bias Brit strikes again.



Green k going your way.

[THE REED]

Take the flaming to the dome, it aint for nsb.

[Guest]

You did not mention it, but it was mentioned. Despite the title clearly stating from 2005-2009.

And even though it wasn't mentioned, Froch's resume should be mentioned because his resume from 2008-2012 rivals Taylor's resume from 2005-2009.

It's just that so many of JT's opponents were ones that had to leave it in the hands of the judges. Someone like WW would be able to outbox him if it was on purely even terms, but "P4P" is decided in the pages of magazines, not in real life, in most instances. There's no way JT should have been able to bash WW around, but the size factor was too significant IMO.

And at the time Taylor was getting widely slated for taking on the likes of Ouma and Spinks. Even Pavlik should have been a formality... I love the guy, but the only moving target he can hit is the bottle.

[Roman Moreno]

First thing it says on the title is from 2005-2009.

And I don't think that any one in Froch's 8-run resume is better than Hopkins Winky.

Overall runs I take Froch. He might have the best single win and draw...But, overall run I think Froch is better. Irrelevant since it's not in the time frame that you specified.

[Guest]

Just like your thread on B-Hop, all you do is criticize American fighters.

Can you point me to a thread of yours where you made fun of David Haye's toe injury, Amir Khan's KO loss to Prescott[or Amir Khan currently whining like a b-tch], any thread making fun of a Brit.

If you can do that, then I will leave you alone about being bias to Brits.

Well, it's biasED (I say "bias Brit" to take the piss) but I did make a thread about Amir's first loss, as well as Audley Harrison's, etc. The idea that I just make fun of Fat Yank fighters is a myth, thought of by insecure Fat Yanks.

I don't have a problem with Amir's current "whining", as I do think he has a point.

[Guest]

The butthurt bias Brit strikes again.

What, that karma I hit you with about an hour ago?

Why not prove how "above it" you are by photoshopping it and upping the image for us all?

And, really, it IS "biased".

[-Kev-]

I know it's biased, I am copying you[yes you are taking the piss okay].

Well, it's biasED (I say "bias Brit" to take the piss) but I did make a thread about Amir's first loss, as well as Audley Harrison's, etc. The idea that I just make fun of Fat Yank fighters is a myth, thought of by insecure Fat Yanks.

I don't have a problem with Amir's current "whining", as I do think he has a point.

I don't have photoshop I don't know what you're talking about.

Anyways, no more flaming here, back to the topic.

Come on man, Amir Khan is taking the PED's thing to a whole new level. Talking about he could have been killed, his life is at risk, etc. He's exaggerating.

[Guest]

Take the flaming to the dome, it aint for nsb.

Fair point Reed, but it's a crap thread from the dumbo stalker. He told me that his follow up thread was "who proved they had a better chin in 2004 than Roy?"

[Guest]

Come on man, Amir Khan is taking the PED's thing to a whole new level. Talking about he could have been killed, his life is at risk, etc. He's exaggerating.

I haven't been following the latest developments, so maybe he has gone OTT.