did tyson ****d desiree?

[kapersky]

Umm...it was a unanimous verdict, Kapersky. Now I'm not no law expert, but isn't a verdict that isn't unanimous classified as a hung jury, in which Tyson would have been sent free (or at least a re-trial)?

"The jury had taken two votes to reach a unanimous verdict", says but one article I have on that situation.

And obviously by the unanimous verdict, the prosecution DID present enough evidence to convince the court of Tyson's guilt, and the evidence presented WAS one-sided in the prosecution's favour.

And as far as your "if he was innocent that would explain his sickening behavior" comment...Have you not done any reading in regards to Tyson's actions before he became famous? You know, the 30+ arrests he had before his teenage years were upon him, the stories of him beating up & robbing old woman, the stories of him actually sexually assaulting young girls when in his youth (which Jimmy Jacobs confirmed), etc. etc...You don't think there's JUST a few hints that Tyson was involved in "sickening behavior" long before the incident with Desiree?

it was like 45% guilty and 35% not guilty i wouldnt say it was enough it this case, i need atleast 50% or more to convince me. no that wasent sickening behaviours before because he was a kids in a bad neighbourhood. after jailtime he did things beyond reasons, tattoo in his face, spended around 200$mills ended up bankrupty with nothing left, went back with don king and bited holyfield twice because he got headbutts, its sick becuase it seem like he dont have "control" over it

[TheEvilSaint]

tyson said once in a letter to jim grey "Mr. Grey, I will never admit to raping that woman. Even if it lessens my time here cuz i just didnt do it."

he also said a few years ago "No i didnt **** her... but i wish i had. her mother, too."

IMO, i dont think he did it if he denied it for so long.

[Dan Tzu]

i dont belive he did it but i truly belive he was capable of doing it, he looks like he didnt have any control over himself from early 1990 and after he got ko by douglas i think he is f3ck up badly.

He may not have done it but he was definitely capable and willing.

[Yogi]

it was like 45% guilty and 35% not guilty i wouldnt say it was enough it this case, i need atleast 50% or more to convince me. no that wasent sickening behaviours before because he was a kids in a bad neighbourhood. after jailtime he did things beyond reasons, tattoo in his face, spended around 200$mills ended up bankrupty with nothing left, went back with don king and bited holyfield twice because he got headbutts, its sick becuase it seem like he dont have "control" over it

Where are you getting your numbers from? Is that just a poll that was wide open to the general public or something? The numbers make absolutely no sense if your asking a full jury, because apparently 20% of them, according to you, weren't around when the jury was to state their verdict.

Regardless though, the verdict was "unanimous" against Tyson and it says as such in at least two books that deal with specifics regarding the trial('Down for the Count' and 'Release of Power', both say "unanimous"), as well as other articles written about the trial...It's funny, I just read another case that was heard by a jury in the state of Indiana, and when the final verdict came down, it was 11 to 1 in favour of a conviction. Yet, they couldn't convict the guy on that occasion, because according to Indiana law, that 11 to 1 decision by the jury is classified as a "hung jury" (in which case it was called a mis-trial).

Unanimous = All

And according to my sources, which I have a few, ALL of the jury put in a guilty verdict in the Tyson case!

And if you're even going to attempt to excuse Tyson for his "sickening behavior" as a youth and teenager (which not everything happened when he was in Brooklyn, my friend, as he was frequently in trouble while under Cus' care anfd beyond), I don't know what to say...except that must also say something about you as a person, I guess.

[scap]

I dont think he ****d her I just think he ******** her a little to hard...it cant be **** if you simply are a little to rough with your pointer finger can it?

[Yogi]

I dont think he ****d her I just think he ******** her a little to hard...it cant be **** if you simply are a little to rough with your pointer finger can it?

LOL!

Get outta here!

[Truth]

i dont belive he did it but i truly belive he was capable of doing it, he looks like he didnt have any control over himself from early 1990 and after he got ko by douglas i think he is f3ck up badly.

I don't think he did it, a guy like Tyson would have admitted it by now. To this day he says its a lie, which leads me to believe Mike.

[kapersky]

Where are you getting your numbers from? Is that just a poll that was wide open to the general public or something?

thats true, so not everyone agree with the jugdes. desiree sue tyson for undisclosed sum of money that make me even more su****ious about her veracity. tyson have nothing to lose now and then if he admit it, everybody would be happen about it so only reason why is because he is innocent or he truly belive he is..

[Yogi]

thats true, so not everyone agree with the jugdes. desiree sue tyson for undisclosed sum of money that make me even more su****ious about her veracity. tyson have nothing to lose now and then if he admit it, everybody would be happen about it so only reason why is because he is innocent or he truly belive he is..

**** man, a poll that's wide open to the public is also wide open to people who have absolutely no knowledge of what happened that night or have any information regarding the trial (or possibly just people who WISHED Tyson was innocent)...How could you possibly take that seriously?

Twelve jurors heard EVERYTHING about the case, and twelve put in a guilty verdict...That's a fact!

And Desiree did sue Tyson in a civil court, and the amount wasn't "undisclosed". If you did some more research on the subject you'll find that Desiree asked for and was rewarded a sum of around one million dollars by the civil court. If you also did your research you'll also find that was LESS than what Tyson's people were offering her to drop the charges before it had even gone to court (although Desiree said she was "not at liberty" to say who offered the money on Tyson's behalf while on Barbara Walter's show, you can find plenty of info regarding the offer by doing some reading...hint - according to the FBI it was a reverend from Providence who made Desiree the finacial offer in exchange for dropping the charges).

[kapersky]

**** man, a poll that's wide open to the public is also wide open to people who have absolutely no knowledge of what happened that night or have any information regarding the trial (or possibly just people who WISHED Tyson was innocent)...How could you possibly take that seriously?

Twelve jurors heard EVERYTHING about the case, and twelve put in a guilty verdict...That's a fact!

And Desiree did sue Tyson in a civil court, and the amount wasn't "undisclosed". If you did some more research on the subject you'll find that Desiree asked for and was rewarded a sum of around one million dollars by the civil court. If you also did your research you'll also find that was LESS than what Tyson's people were offering her to drop the charges before it had even gone to court (although Desiree said she was "not at liberty" to say who offered the money on Tyson's behalf while on Barbara Walter's show, you can find plenty of info regarding the offer by doing some reading...hint - according to the FBI it was a reverend from Providence who made Desiree the finacial offer in exchange for dropping the charges).

i havent done any serious research i google found some old articles read it and form my own understanding base on them. i didnt know tysons people offer a sum of money (link?)to her, i am sure tyson didnt defend/said good thing to convince the court. if its so one-sided why didnt tyson admit it? he have nothing to lose..