Comments Thread For: Ward-Dawson Encounter Halts Stampede For WBC Title

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IMDAZED
    Fair but Firm
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2006
    • 42644
    • 1,134
    • 1,770
    • 67,152

    #31
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
    Pacquiao fights for titles at catchweights = This is what's wrong with boxing!

    Two black fighters fighting at a catchweight for a title = CANT WAIT!

    Yeah, Dawson-Ward. Can't wait. Pacquiao-Margarito? Not so much. An adult would probably see the blatant differences. A child? Not so much. Never any extenuating circumstances with pea-brained Dirk.

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #32
      Originally posted by IMDAZED
      Yeah, Dawson-Ward. Can't wait. Pacquiao-Margarito? Not so much. An adult would probably see the blatant differences. A child? Not so much. Never any extenuating circumstances with pea-brained Dirk.
      Its funny that a child has sussed you out so easily.

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #33
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        Its funny that a child has sussed you out so easily.
        Well only a child would think that.

        Comment

        • Kagami Taiga
          Generation of Miracles
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 19078
          • 703
          • 228
          • 40,183

          #34
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
          What weight is it gonna be at? 168? Doesn't really change my point. Surely Ward is then "draining" Dawson?

          But CANT WAIT!
          but now ur excuse for ridiculing the fight is changing. at any rate, only pac fight i had an issue with in the "catchweight" and "draining" department is margs. and that was a ****ty fight all around and if u cant tell the difference between this fight and that one then the jokes on u.

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #35
            Originally posted by DempseyRollin
            but now ur excuse for ridiculing the fight is changing. at any rate, only pac fight i had an issue with in the "catchweight" and "draining" department is margs. and that was a ****ty fight all around and if u cant tell the difference between this fight and that one then the jokes on u.
            Im not ridiculing the fight. The fight is ok to me. Im ridiculing people's double standards.

            Comment

            • IMDAZED
              Fair but Firm
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 42644
              • 1,134
              • 1,770
              • 67,152

              #36
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              Im not ridiculing the fight. The fight is ok to me. Im ridiculing people's double standards.
              If you can't see the differences between Pacquiao-Margarito and this fight, then you really, really have deep-seated issues.

              Comment

              • Dirk Diggler UK
                Deleted
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 48836
                • 1,312
                • 693
                • 58,902

                #37
                Originally posted by IMDAZED
                If you can't see the differences between Pacquiao-Margarito and this fight, then you really, really have deep-seated issues.
                Yeah....sure, it was only Pacquiao-Margarito that you had an issue with. I seem to remember you laying into Pacquiao for "making" Morales fight at 130....whoops!

                Like I said, you don't fool me. You're the only one with deep-seated issues and insecurities. You're transparent as hell.

                Comment

                • IMDAZED
                  Fair but Firm
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 42644
                  • 1,134
                  • 1,770
                  • 67,152

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                  Yeah....sure, it was only Pacquiao-Margarito that you had an issue with. I seem to remember you laying into Pacquiao for "making" Morales fight at 130....whoops!

                  Like I said, you don't fool me. You're the only one with deep-seated issues and insecurities. You're transparent as hell.
                  Yes, I did have an issue with it. So did Morales, who begged for 135 but was told he would lose the payday if not. So yes, I had an issue with it. A little bit different from this scenario, no? Also, I had no issue with Pacquiao-Cotto at a catchweight. Maybe because Cotto is black. So childish.

                  Comment

                  • Dirk Diggler UK
                    Deleted
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 48836
                    • 1,312
                    • 693
                    • 58,902

                    #39
                    Originally posted by IMDAZED
                    Yes, I did have an issue with it. So did Morales, who begged for 135 but was told he would lose the payday if not. So yes, I had an issue with it. A little bit different from this scenario, no? Also, I had no issue with Pacquiao-Cotto at a catchweight. Maybe because Cotto is black. So childish.
                    How is it different exactly?

                    You mean cos the fighters are black, right?

                    Comment

                    • IronDanHamza
                      BoxingScene Icon
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 49030
                      • 4,925
                      • 269
                      • 104,043

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                      Yeah....sure, it was only Pacquiao-Margarito that you had an issue with. I seem to remember you laying into Pacquiao for "making" Morales fight at 130....whoops!

                      Like I said, you don't fool me. You're the only one with deep-seated issues and insecurities. You're transparent as hell.
                      That situation is much different to this one.

                      Morales really didn't want to fight at 130 again.

                      Evidently, Dawson is absolutely fine with 168.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP