Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

who rans higher as a ATG Floyd or Pernell Whitaker

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • list all of whitakers best wins and accomplishments..............Floyd wins this fellas if people rate Whitaker top 10-15 atg.im sorry Floyd has to be up there no way in hell is is up there and Floyd aint

    43-0
    8 damn time champ in 5 divisions
    over half his fights title fights and all wins
    3 time lineal champ


    we are witnessing greatness

    Comment


    • Originally posted by larryx2013 View Post
      so how the hell was Nelson proven at lightweight????he is fucking 0-2
      He was 32-1, prime and went up 5 pounds

      U do know his 2nd loss at LW came 8 yrs after losing to Pernell at LW right

      Comment


      • Originally posted by larryx2013 View Post
        so how the hell was Nelson proven at lightweight????he is fucking 0-2
        Does the same apply for Ricky Hatton?

        He's 1-1 at WW. You could argue he should be 0-2 at WW.

        Does the same logic apply for him?

        Or only when it suits you?

        Whitaker fought a prime ATG, Azumah Nelson, at one weight class above where he was previously campaigning.

        Discrediting that win is incredibly foolish.

        As foolish as discrediting Mayweather's win over Hatton because of weight.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by BoxingWizard27 View Post
          He was 32-1, prime and went up 5 pounds

          U do know his 2nd loss at LW came 8 yrs after losing to Pernell at LW right
          He will do when he checks Boxrec.

          Comment


          • Lol@ at all the pretentious "old school boxing experts" reaching like s**t, the older u get...the farther the walk was to school

            If the question is who was the better boxer, the answer is Pernell. I would entertain an argument stating otherwise.

            But the OP is asking who gets the nod when considering accomplishments (im guessing belts) and resume (quality/caliber of opponents).

            Im not understanding the basis for discrediting some of Floyd's wins, especially over Marquez

            Comment


            • Originally posted by larryx2013 View Post
              list all of whitakers best wins and accomplishments..............Floyd wins this fellas if people rate Whitaker top 10-15 atg.im sorry Floyd has to be up there no way in hell is is up there and Floyd aint

              43-0
              8 damn time champ in 5 divisions
              over half his fights title fights and all wins
              3 time lineal champ


              we are witnessing greatness
              Whitaker has a lot of good wins;

              Ramirez x2
              McGirt x2
              Haugen
              Nazario
              Penelton
              Mayweather
              Vasquez

              These are all very good wins.

              Then on top of that he has two ATG's in their prime's in Chavez and Nelson.

              You could also argue he beat Oscar in his prime but I felt that could easily have gone either way.

              The scoring of course was terrible but you can't complain with the decision IMO. Although I thought Whitaker won, it was close.

              Comment


              • This comparing the Marquez win to the Nelson win is sheer comedy.

                Whitaker beat a career Super Feather at Lightweight

                Floyd beat a career Featherweight at Welterweight

                Comment


                • Originally posted by MalikKnucklez View Post
                  Lol@ at all the pretentious "old school boxing experts" reaching like s**t, the older u get...the farther the walk was to school

                  If the question is who was the better boxer, the answer is Pernell. I would entertain an argument stating otherwise.

                  But the OP is asking who gets the nod when considering accomplishments (im guessing belts) and resume (quality/caliber of opponents).

                  Im not understanding the basis for discrediting some of Floyd's wins, especially over Marquez
                  The win over Marquez is a good win, IMO. Many disagree but I personally consider it a good win after the Pacquaio fight.

                  But, obviously, it isn't as good as Whitaker's win over Nelson.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                    Does the same apply for Ricky Hatton?

                    He's 1-1 at WW. You could argue he should be 0-2 at WW.

                    Does the same logic apply for him?

                    Or only when it suits you?

                    Whitaker fought a prime ATG, Azumah Nelson, at one weight class above where he was previously campaigning.

                    Discrediting that win is incredibly foolish.

                    As foolish as discrediting Mayweather's win over Hatton because of weight.
                    what makes nelson better than Hatton or Marquez or Cotto or Mosley or Oscar or Castillo or Corrales

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by larryx2013 View Post
                      what makes nelson better than Hatton or Marquez or Cotto or Mosley or Oscar or Castillo or Corrales
                      Are you deliberately acting like a spaz today?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP