Comments Thread For: Floyd Mayweather: If I Want To Retire, That's What I'll Do

[The Big Dunn]

Yes Floyd is full of BS, and goes to show you cant trust anything he says. He is a very emotional guy and says things without thinking. He got a beating and he is not sure he can fight again if it means getting hit like that, getting hit wasnt part of the equation.



80% sure he is retiring, didnt floyd say that? Sounds like he wants to retire to me!



Exactly, ive said it before. Floyd fans like to criticise Pac for fighting Margarito like it is a walk in the park or something beating Marge. It was a fight Pac wouldnt get much credit for, yet was very dangerous to be giving that much weight away.

Floyd fans shouldnt criticise Pac for fighting dangerous guys.

oddsmakers had manny almost a 6-1 favorite. guess they are *****s.

[Oxn]

When Floyd doesnt completely dominate someone he was suppose to dominate the excuses are:

Well hes 35, hes older now, Cotto is much better than we thought.

When Manny doesnt dominate Marquez the excuses are:

He never improved, hes off the shakes, hes one dimensional, his previous opponents are handpicked to make him look good.

Oo the irony.

[jbpanama]

ALl the words and you still haven't answered the question. Since manny hasn't lost in 10 years, has he taken any risks?

EIther you think yes or no. Which is it?

Yeah BIG DUMM, he's taken risks, and been a Betting Underdog, on occassion!!!

[Oxn]

Baldomir and victor the gap was as big if not bigger. Lets not rewrite history to suit the argument.

Props to you for actually answering the question.

We cant even debate now because your full on lying.

[The Big Dunn]

see, i told you. you'll generate various opinions on it. it's subjective. there's really no point in answering your question. you mention speed but you didn't mention the weight as if it's nothing.

You said manny had no advantages, I just reminded you he did, thats why he was the favorite going in.

You wont answer because if weight is a risk for one its a risk for all. Hence, floyd took the same risks manny has.

You dont care either way. Long as you can hate floyd and blow manny your happy.

[The Big Dunn]

We cant even debate now because your full on lying.

If you say so. You can always verify. But its cool.

[hugh grant]

Pacs always fighting competent fighters on a regular basis so is taking risks often. Floyd on the other hand does fight dangerous guys, but not nearly as often as Pac.

Morals of the story, Pac is a risk taker and Floyd isnt. He wanted a medal for fighting SSM just cos he came off a victory over Margarito. My reply to that is, you of your own choosing only fight once every 2 years, so is it asking too much for you to fight a challenging fight once in 2 years. Cant expect Pac to fight as much as he does and have superfights every fight.

[The Big Dunn]

When Floyd doesnt completely dominate someone he was suppose to dominate the excuses are:

Well hes 35, hes older now, Cotto is much better than we thought.

When Manny doesnt dominate Marquez the excuses are:

He never improved, hes off the shakes, hes one dimensional, his previous opponents are handpicked to make him look good.

Oo the irony.

The top is true. The bottom is true except for the shakes and 1 dimensional stuff.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

not surprised that talks about retirement are coming up again

[sinclair]

i think its a good idea for him to retire he looked like ish on saturday.