1 thing i have noticed bout Cotto fans and appreciate

[ELHURACAN58]

Two reasons:

1. After two brutal losses, Cotto now has mostly his real fans left (mostly ricans) and no bandwagon.

2. Even if people wanted to talk ish, they wouldnt do it against the best P4P fighter right now, who Cotto is facing this saturday.

[Walt Liquor]

You still haven't answered the question.

Are you saying that Mayweather should have fought Shane in 2006?

Yes or no.

I'm not interested in what you were comparing it to.

I've asked this simple question time and time again and you haven't answered it. So what is it?

This is the first time you asked that question.

I answered it to dazed.

Anyway, he tried to and shane wouldnt fight him. If he did, and he beat shane, it would look better on his resume than his win in 2010.

Your reading comprehension sucks and my grammer sucks when typing on a cellphone. Big deal.

[IMDAZED]

No........it doesnt. I also wrote legit champ on soke posts.

Margs at 147>baldo at 147

Hatton at 140>hatton at 147. And you agree with that. For guy like dominicano and dan who think he's the same at both weights, the lineal, real champ at 140 is a better win than the same guy in a division that he doesnt hold that distinction at no?


Or have you been lying in the past when you've expressed both of the above sentiments yourself?

Is that your point? Because if it is, I'm not the only person in this thread who agrees with that--although I'd argue that the weight difference in the Hatton bout was negligible; both fighters lost by having the fight at '47.

Second, it seems you're missing what I'm saying. Which is...so are you saying it's Floyd's fault? Are you attempting to establish a pattern here? If so, show and prove. Because you made intimated both of those things in previous posts and then backtracked, and have even discarded your Mosley example now. So again, what are you really saying?

[Walt Liquor]

No, but it would be nice if you used analogies that enforced your original premise. Clearly Mosley did not. Neither did Hatton. Yet, you were trying to establish a pattern of Floyd not doing enough to get better fights when clearly, in those examples, that was not the case. So what you have is a one-off here with the Pacquiao situation. And if you want to say that, just stick with it. But know that the other guy deserves as much blame, if not more.

And i have sergio as well. Why cant you keep up with this coversation?

Pac gets blame too, but tye reality is that either of them could hage made the fight happen if they wanted to. Period.


For the last time, i DID NOT use shane as an example of floyd not doing enough to get that particular fight. Show me where i did that of stfu about it.


Hatton, i think he should have gone down for the belts and it would have enhanced his resume because it was a better hatton at 140 (which you are still ducking the fact that you agree).

[IMDAZED]

And i have sergio as well. Why cant you keep up with this coversation?

Pac gets blame too, but tye reality is that either of them could hage made the fight happen if they wanted to. Period.


For the last time, i DID NOT use shane as an example of floyd not doing enough to get that particular fight. Show me where i did that of stfu about it.


Hatton, i think he should have gone down for the belts and it would have enhanced his resume because it was a better hatton at 140 (which you are still ducking the fact that you agree).

I said "I'm not the only person that agrees" so I'm not quite sure what you mean by I'm ducking. You really are missing a lot here. Second, I said the weight difference in that bout was negligible because it was a better Mayweather at 140 too. And the belts mean as much as Baldomir's meant although Ricky was obviously a much better fighter at 140 than Tata was at welter. And third, you still haven't responded to what I was asking so I'll post again, by raising these examples, are you implying that it was Floyd's fault? Are you trying to establish a pattern?

[IronDanHamza]

This is the first time you asked that question.

I answered it to dazed.

Anyway, he tried to and shane wouldnt fight him. If he did, and he beat shane, it would look better on his resume than his win in 2010.

Your reading comprehension sucks and my grammer sucks when typing on a cellphone. Big deal.

I've asked that question numerous times I constantly asked you "Are you saying he avoided Shane?" "How did he avoid Shane" and you simply wouldn't answer.

Ok, so we've established that Mayweather tried to and Shane wouldn't fight him.

So, going back to your orginial point - "Mayweather could have been a Top 25 ATG, if he wanted to"

How does this situation with Shane fit your criteria? Considering, you've established it was out of Mayweather's hands.

This same thing applies for Hatton at 140.

It's funny you talk about reading comprehension, yet, it's taken you 30+ pages to get here.

[NChristo]

.......................

I'm in a state of speechless rage.

I did NOT even expect some bull**** like this.

This is totally out of line.

You're going to make the kids believe that **** pulling bull**** like that.

Don't worry mate you'll get over it eventually, accepting what happened is the hardest part.
Pastrano won a clear decision, it's even on boxrec.

[IronDanHamza]

I said "I'm not the only person that agrees" so I'm not quite sure what you mean by I'm ducking. You really are missing a lot here. Second, I said the weight difference in that bout was negligible because it was a better Mayweather at 140 too. And the belts mean as much as Baldomir's meant although Ricky was obviously a much better fighter at 140 than Tata was at welter. And third, you still haven't responded to what I was asking so I'll post again, by raising these examples, are you implying that it was Floyd's fault? Are you trying to establish a pattern?

And the guy genuinely has the audacity to question another person's reading comprehension.

[Walt Liquor]

Is that your point? Because if it is, I'm not the only person in this thread who agrees with that--although I'd argue that the weight difference in the Hatton bout was negligible; both fighters lost by having the fight at '47.

Second, it seems you're missing what I'm saying. Which is...so are you saying it's Floyd's fault? Are you attempting to establish a pattern here? If so, show and prove. Because you made intimated both of those things in previous posts and then backtracked, and have even discarded your Mosley example now. So again, what are you really saying?

Yes, its really that simple. Thats what i was saying and i was making zero implications regarding floyd-shane. Only that an earlier win vs shane would have been better. Like if he beat manny a few yrs ago as opposed to beating him in 1-2 more years.

As far as the secojd paragraph. I said i wish floyd went out of his way to enhance his atg status more as opposed to fighting for the money. I gave margs, hatton, paq, and sergio as examples so far. I could have added more, but i didnt and i do think there are times when floyd could have tried harder to get fights that would enhance his legacy. But ya'll fools are dragging that into the convo in your rush to defend floyd. I was talking about fights he could have easily had that would enhahce his atg status.

[IronDanHamza]

Don't worry mate you'll get over it eventually, accepting what happened is the hardest part.
Pastrano won a clear decision, it's even on boxrec.

****ing Boxrec warrior.

*Trys to think of fighters you like who have been robbed*

****!