1 thing i have noticed bout Cotto fans and appreciate

[IronDanHamza]

Don't make me pull out John H Stracey.

I actually met him the other week.

Should have got him to sign a sheet of paper saying "I beat up NChristo's hero who by the way isn't a Top 5 WW"

[IronDanHamza]

I did 10 times. Please learn how to read, last time...

Its comparing fighting pac in 09 to pac whenever floyd gets around to fighting him. Meaning he's fighting him too late. The shane case is a but more dramatic, but i used it to make a clear point that is waaaay over your head.

So, again, what are you actually saying?

Other than the obvious - Shane in 06 is better than Shane in 2010.

What's your point? That Mayweather should have fought him in 2006? Or what?

I've asked you multiples times you clarify this and you haven't done so yet.

[IMDAZED]

No i didnt, i said a shane win in 06 would hace been better than his shame win in 10. Strictly as an example for the pac fight being abetter win in 09 than in '13. You fools took it as a slight for god knows why (well i know why).

Ok and?

As far as the second part, dont make me laugh. Thats kids stuff and its beneath me. I know you think hatton would have been a better win at 140 cuz u've said it before.

It was a pretty simple question. If the win would've been better at 140 because Hatton held the lineal title, does that mean the Baldomir win was better than a Maragrito win at that time?

[NChristo]

Don't make me pull out John H Stracey.

I actually met him the other week.

Should have got him to sign a sheet of paper saying "I beat up NChristo's hero who by the way isn't a Top 5 WW"

You're a ****.

[IronDanHamza]

You're a ****.

Hey, you came in here all guns blazing! Not me!

[-Spinal-]

At the end of the day, coming from a Floyd fan who is upset at the choice of his next opponent. Floyd fought who he was supposed to fight as soon as he could, as soon as it made the most business sense, as soon as Arum was out of the picture. And before you bite my head off, the guys who Floyd didn't fight(all Top rank guys coincidentally), ended up, imo, not mattering. Margarito does not matter, and imo he would have just been taking up space as a "he doesn't count cause he's a cheater" kind of win on Floyd's resume.

Imo, Cotto is nothing on Floyd's resume. He wouldn't have been nothing if he was an 07-08 win, or a 2012, 2013, 2014 whatever. Same difference. A fighter who's okay, but loses to good fighters, and is nowhere near being great. Margarito was an okay fighter who was cheating, therefore he was "good" in his prime, but again, like Cotto, not a great fighter.

So Floyd missed out on having two okay fighters on his resume that I would have mentioned right along with Judah, Baldomir, Gatti. Imo Marquez is a greater win than Cotto or Margarito. And he proved he ended up being a better fighter than people gave him credit for(including myself) in 9/2009, by beating the "#1" WW, "#1 P4P fighter", "FOTD" Manny pacquaio 2 years after that shut out performance that seemingly looked like he didn't belong at that weight when in fact he just didn't belong in the same ring as the guy who shut him out, something both Cotto and Margarito failed to do(beating Pacquiao).

Floyd has better names on his resume than Cotto and Margarito. And imo, Marquez is a greater win than Pacquaio because Marquez>Pacquiao. The fight of the decade happened, and it was Mayweather vs Marquez. The next best fight is Mayweather vs Martinez. Move along Pacquiao, you don't belong in the same ring as Floyd, you ****ing fraud. Good luck with Bradley, cause you're gonna need it.

Ah man, I love my posts

[Walt Liquor]

When you attack someone's reading comprehension you should make sure you have no grammatical mistakes in your post.

Talk to me after you have to repeat yourself more than 10x.

Grammer/spelling is different from reading comprehension.

[IronDanHamza]

Talk to me after you have to repeat yourself more than 10x.

Grammer/spelling is different from reading comprehension.

I know.

Still, logically you really should make sure you don't have any grammatical mistakes when attacking another posters reading comprehension. It makes yourself look ****** if you do. Which, you did.

But in all honesty, I'm pretty sure that ship sailed about 20 pages ago.

[Mr. Fantastic]

They learned their lesson with the first Margarito and the Pac fight.

[Walt Liquor]

So, again, what are you actually saying?

Other than the obvious - Shane in 06 is better than Shane in 2010.

What's your point? That Mayweather should have fought him in 2006? Or what?

I've asked you multiples times you clarify this and you haven't done so yet.

11th time at least...... I only brought it up as a parallel to fighting pac in '13 or whenever he fights him (if he ever does) as compared to pac in '09-'10.

Thats it, i was talking about fights floyd could have that would put his reume in the top 25 atg status. Maybe you remember that.

The funny part is that its not even a big deal, but yall got all worked up over nothing.

Would you prefer if i put all 10 times i answered your question in one post next?