1 thing i have noticed bout Cotto fans and appreciate

[IMDAZED]

I know that shane ducked the fight with floyd in 06 cuz he didnt want floyd to get paid. Then shane started. Alling floyd put again in like '08 when floyd was the one getting paid

I never said otherwise in this thread. I did say that i dont care. And i only brought shane up fir the pac reference.

You said Floyd didn't try hard enough ("make a serious effort") in making these fights. Now you're singing a different tune with regards to Mosley. We can keep going down this list of names if you want. Hatton next?

[Larry the boss]

damn 45 pages???i created a classic thread................

[PACnPBFsuck]

damn 45 pages???i created a classic thread................

[Walt Liquor]

O and what got sand in dan and dunn's vaginas was that i said an '06 win over shane would have been better than the '10 win that he has. I guess that's some sort of slight.

[Walt Liquor]

You said Floyd didn't try hard enough ("make a serious effort") in making these fights. Now you're singing a different tune with regards to Mosley. We can keep going down this list of names if you want. Hatton next?

I wasnt referring to the ***in mosley fight, nor did i imply it. I was talking about 4 fights. I think floyd should have taken hatton's belts at 140, fought margs (cuz these days floyd seems to care soooo much about who calls him out), he should have fought manny in '09-'10 regardless of the testing to enhance his legacy amd he should fight sergio.

The sensitive crowd brought up everything else.

[IMDAZED]

I wasnt referring to the ***in mosley fight, nor did i imply it. I was talking about 4 fights. I think floyd should have taken hatton's belts at 140, fought margs (cuz these days floyd seems to care soooo much about who calls him out), he should have fought manny in '09-'10 regardless of the testing to enhance his legacy amd he should fight sergio.

The sensitive crowd brought up everything else.

You said Floyd should've fought him in 2006, instead of 2010. Implying that it was his fault. Then you said he didn't make a serious enough effort. Now you're saying it was Shane's fault.

Second...you implied he should've fought Hatton at 140 because of the lineal title Hatton had but then I'm assuming you believe he was right to fight Baldomir over Margarito, right? Same reasoning?

[Larry the boss]

in less than 1 day this thread almost has more replies than the manny bradley thread.............lol i see real fans are posting here

[Bushbaby]

in less than 1 day this thread almost has more replies than the manny bradley thread.............lol i see real fans are posting here

It's probably because this fight is 1st in all fairness. After saturday & the repercussions that Follow all hype will go to Pacman-Bradley.

[IronDanHamza]

O and what got sand in dan and dunn's vaginas was that i said an '06 win over shane would have been better than the '10 win that he has. I guess that's some sort of slight.

What?

Do you just make **** up?

When did I refute that?

I merely asked you to clarify the relevance of that statement and you've still yet to.

"06 shane is better than '10 shane"

Ok? And?

[IronDanHamza]

It's probably because this fight is 1st in all fairness. After saturday & the repercussions that Follow all hype will go to Pacman-Bradley.

That's true.

I expect the Pac-Bradley hype to pick up soon.

Can't believe it's just a month out.