Two Of The Most Controversial Judges In Boxing Will Be Scoring Mayweather vs Cotto
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by MastrangeloI'll never agree on that, HBO team were always so biased on Barrera. He got a gift against Juarez in the first fight and they were like nothing happend.
Then the rematch with Rocky was also very close fight that I thought he lost as well and they were just talking this bull**** that Barrera is one of the greatest that ever lived and he fought like Ali. Laugh My ****ing Ass Out.
Barrera landed plenty of Marquez, but Marquez was putting his punches together and landed more. He won it clearly and I'm glad judges had more senses than Lampley, Merchant and LAdderman that night.
Lampley is full of s**t, just listen to his annoncing when he's breaking down the action, he gets s**t wrong all the time.
A recent example was Mayweather-Ortiz. In the opening seconds of round 3 when Ortiz was backing Mayweather into the ropes, he got hit by 2 solid left hooks from Floyd, and all Lampley said was "Another left hand lead from Ortiz", and then Steward set his straight for a second and said "That's what I'd like to see Floyd o more of, jabbing and hooking", and then Lampley said "Good counter punch". And at the end of the round, Ortiz rushed in and got popped with a right hand from Floyd, and he said "A good elft cross from Victor Ortiz". Than right after that Ortiz got popped with an uppercut from Floyd to end the round, and lampley said "He's quick enough to fight with Floyd Mayweather".
Lampley is a f**king moron.Comment
-
Generally, robberies favour the cash cow in the fight... with that in mind, I'd say it's very unlikely that Mayweather will be on the end of a bad decision.
It's more likely that Cotto is ripped off (Assuming he does a lot better than everyone expects, you get what I mean).Comment
-
Damn. I can't believe that I forgot about Hopkins-Wright, that was a really terrible decision, it could easily have been scored a draw or even a win for Wright. Hopkins spent more time headbutting and clinching in that fight than he did actually boxing, while Wright outlanded him. The only person who did a worse job than the judges was the referee. I honestly feel that Hopkins should have been disqualified in that fight. He deliberately butted Winky at least 5 times and to call his clinching "excessive" would have been a gross understatement.
I know that you don't like Barrera, but come on bro, that fight with Marquez was the classic 6-6 or 7-5 bout. Either guy could have gotten the decision, or it could have been ruled a draw and nobody would have complained. However, having Marquez winning by 5 points is wide of the mark. I don't think Floyd is going to leave any doubt and i'm not really worried because i'm expecting him to completely outclass Cotto in a very dominant performance. However, I never feel comfortable trusting people with a shady past like Jarman and Moretti.Comment
-
Generally, robberies favour the cash cow in the fight... with that in mind, I'd say it's very unlikely that Mayweather will be on the end of a bad decision.
It's more likely that Cotto is ripped off (Assuming he does a lot better than everyone expects, you get what I mean).Comment
-
Could go either way op.
Lettuce be real, the real paycheck is in pac-mayweather. Do you think they would try and intenionally score against this megafight/megapaycheck? On the same token, maybe bob doesnt even want that fight to ever go down.
But lets just get the excuses out of our system early.Last edited by ~AK49~; 04-28-2012, 04:34 PM.Comment
-
Did you ever think that it would be Cotto getting the screw job? Not saying Cotto wins cause I think Floyd wins easy UD. But if Cotto shocked the world and did somehow win it would be Floyd who would get the call not Cotto...Comment
Comment