Boxrec has Ezzard Charles as #1 heavyweight of all time.

[brownpimp88]

I thought fighters from 50 years ago was inferior to taday's heavyweights.

nope, fighters from the 20s and below are inferior.

[macman]

Wasn't Jimmy Bivins a Middle/light-heavy as well?

[BrooklynBomber]

Charles is strangely underrated by many, but of course he is not a #1 heavy.

[Hydro]

Charles may be deserving of this ranking at 175, but not HW.

[psychopath]

I was telling you people to screw boxrec but you won't listen.

[BrooklynBomber]

I was telling you people to screw boxrec but you won't listen.

We all use boxrec as a laughing stock, when you are down and need a good giggle, boxrec is to the rescue

[psychopath]

We all use boxrec as a laughing stock, when you are down and need a good giggle, boxrec is to the rescue

That's right buddy.

[Animal Squabbs]

No pay no attention to BoxRec's all-time rankings because they are flawed to say the least.

But one thing they do is carry over what a fighter did at a lower weight into the higher weight division, in which case it becomes more of a P4P computerized divisional ranking...In terms of P4P greatness, yes, one could make the case that Ezzard Charles was the single greatest fighter to have ever fought in the Heavyweight division.

BULL****, by that criteria Holyfield is thirty times better that Charles.

That ranking is the most rediculous bull**** ever.

[Kid Achilles]

BULL****, by that criteria Holyfield is thirty times better that Charles.

That ranking is the most rediculous bull**** ever.

WTF are you talking about? Charles accomplished so much more than Holyfield did beneath heavyweight.

[butterfly1964]

nope, fighters from the 20s and below are inferior.

You probably never seen any footage from that time period, so you are not fit to talk about that era.