The Ring new P4P Rankings. Mayweather replaces Pacquiao as #1?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Roman Moreno
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2012
    • 2511
    • 85
    • 46
    • 2,934

    #61
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
    **** list.
    It's all an opinionated list. You have your opinion that Khan>Bradley. Which I completely disagree with. All an opinion.

    I don't think his list is terrible. I agree with the top 6. The order was just unique. I haven't seen that order before. Doesn't mean it is a **** list. I think those 6, plus with Donaire, those 7 are interchangeable. But, that's my opinion that most might disagree with also.

    Comment

    • WESS
      Most Definitely
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2008
      • 13012
      • 977
      • 1,143
      • 20,219

      #62
      Originally posted by IMDAZED
      You can make an outside argument for #3 and maybe #2 but I agree he doesn't deserve the top slot. Maybe I'm giving Martinez too much credit but he gets my #1 for moving up and absolutely flattening a feared pound for pounder in Williams and an undisputed champ who had never lost at 160 before (Pavlik). He then beat arguably the best junior middle (via KO) in a dominating performance and has KO'ed two other contenders in dramatic fashion. The winner of Lee-Chavez next to boot. Mayweather gets my vote for #2 but that has more to what Pacquiao has done (or hasn't done, I should say) lately. And I thought he lost to Marquez. He hasn't done much since beating Cotto as you said.
      I agree. I have it Martinez, Mayweather and Ward. All 3 have easily accomplished more than Pac since beating Cotto at 145 lbs. Hell JMM has, Hopkins has.... Too many fighters accomplishing more than Pac for Pac to be top 5 let alone top 3.

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #63
        Originally posted by Roman Moreno
        It's all an opinionated list. You have your opinion that Khan>Bradley. Which I completely disagree with. All an opinion.

        I don't think his list is terrible. I agree with the top 6. The order was just unique. I haven't seen that order before. Doesn't mean it is a **** list. I think those 6, plus with Donaire, those 7 are interchangeable. But, that's my opinion that most might disagree with also.
        Martinez at no1? Hes been fighting the likes of Barker and Macklin. If Pacquiao or Mayweather were fighting those calibre opponents, I can only imagine the outrage. And I like Sergio way more than either of them.

        Comment

        • IMDAZED
          Fair but Firm
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 42644
          • 1,134
          • 1,770
          • 67,152

          #64
          Originally posted by WESS
          I agree. I have it Martinez, Mayweather and Ward. All 3 have easily accomplished more than Pac since beating Cotto at 145 lbs. Hell JMM has, Hopkins has.... Too many fighters accomplishing more than Pac for Pac to be top 5 let alone top 3.
          Don't forget Klitschko. I know his opposition hasn't been spectacular but what he's done is damn impressive and deserves more kudos than he gets. And he's a pretty good fighter, he really is. Has held the mantle well.

          Comment

          • WESS
            Most Definitely
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2008
            • 13012
            • 977
            • 1,143
            • 20,219

            #65
            Originally posted by IMDAZED
            Don't forget Klitschko. I know his opposition hasn't been spectacular but what he's done is damn impressive and deserves more kudos than he gets. And he's a pretty good fighter, he really is. Has held the mantle well.
            No doubt about it...

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP