Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Any one noticed how Lampley put Merchant in his place several times for hating on SM?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostCould be taken as a slight on Sergio i.e he'll never be as good as Jones. It just depends how you look at it. Too many people hear what they wanna hear and get butthurt when its a fighter they like getting criticised.
Im a Sergio fan but it sounds like Merchant was spot on with his analysis. He WAS just throwing one left-hand at a time in the early stages of that fight and he was getting countered by a mediocre fighter like Macklin.
Why is it wrong for Merchant to call it like it is? You guys want him to constantly suck dick like Max Kellerman?
He said, we're not watching Roy Jones, we're watching a fighter who started boxing late and blah blah blah, started complimenting him on how good he is for the age he started in. So no, it was not a slight on Martinez, Lampley was defending him. Cause it's a fact, we're not watching Roy, so Merchant needs to shut his trap about Roy. We might not even be watching a HOF'er cause it's just too late for him to do anything big enough to get in, I think.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EngorgedW/Blood View PostWhat Lmapley said after that, would tell you what that comment was about.
He said, we're not watching Roy Jones, we're watching a fighter who started boxing late and blah blah blah, started complimenting him on how good he is for the age he started in. So no, it was not a slight on Martinez, Lampley was defending him. Cause it's a fact, we're not watching Roy, so Merchant needs to shut his trap about Roy. We might not even be watching a HOF'er cause it's just too late for him to do anything big enough to get in, I think.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostBecause Macklin isn't the one being showcased. It was Sergio's decision to fight such a lacklustre opponent and thus he is under more scrutiny to perform.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Juanma9 View PostMacklin is a lackluster opponent? Didn't you hear about the robbery in Germany? Which opponent is more solid at 160 than Macklin? I thought Macklin was a legit opponent coming into the fight. Macklin is no Barker IMO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostIf doing well against Felix Sturm is an indicator of being a credible opponent then I guess Martin Murray is next.
I'll go on record in saying that Murray is not a legit contender and doesn't deserve a title shot with any belt holder at 160.
Comment
-
why do u guys even bother responding to dirk? hes a butthurt kahn fan who has no1 2 to cheer for so he wants to make everyone else feel bad for cheering for decent boxers. ignore the hater.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Juanma9 View PostMurray's performance against Sturm was worlds apart from Macklin's. I saw the fight and he was gifted a draw. I thought it was particularly strange that they favored the challenger this time.
I'll go on record in saying that Murray is not a legit contender and doesn't deserve a title shot with any belt holder at 160.
What has Macklin really done outside of that? He's a European level fighter.Last edited by Dirk Diggler UK; 03-19-2012, 06:47 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DempseyRollin View Postwhy do u guys even bother responding to dirk? hes a butthurt kahn fan who has no1 2 to cheer for so he wants to make everyone else feel bad for cheering for decent boxers. ignore the hater.
But I dont DICKRIDE him like apparently you feel everyone should do to your favourite fighters. I don't think he can do no wrong.
Do you ever post without referencing "hate" and "haters"? Like I told you once before, it sounds like you were raised by women and didn't have a father figure in your life.
Comment
Comment