Who was/is the more awkward, effective and better southpaw, Naseem Hamed or Sergio Martinez?
Who is the better southpaw?
Collapse
-
Who is the better southpaw?
11Hamed was more effective, awkward and better fighter18.18%2Hamed was just more awkward0.00%0Hamed was just more effective9.09%1Martinez is more effective, awkward and better fighter45.45%5Martinez is just more awkward0.00%0Martinez is only more effective27.27%3The poll is expired.
Tags: None -
hey jab... so what do u mean? better as in legacy / body of work
or the way they are in the ring? -
-
Hamed I think, Sergio gets hit much more then Naz did.
Naz packed ridiculous power in both hands, he could knock a man out from any angle with any punch.
Emmanuel Steward claimed Naz hit harder then Lennox Lewis.Comment
-
Comment
-
I don't think Steward said Naz hit harder than Lennox, but I seem to recall him saying he was the hardest p4p puncher he'd ever worked with.Comment
-
Some guy told me he broke his left wrist whilst playing football & learned to fight as a southpaw.
But yh his jab is a rocket & the way he brings it up from knee-height is a thing of beauty.
I think it was at the end of round 8 vs Macklin when he stepped it up, damn he absolutely tortured him with the jab.Comment
-
being awkward gotta go with the prince... the guy was more elusive, slipping punches and have been a combination punching machine (specially when he was still with ingle...)
sometimes you have this impression that he relies mostly on instincts as a fighter... not to say he aint a thinking fighter but still...
naseem's name isnt really a thing you associate with "fundamentals skills..." like whitaker and pacquiao, these guys are awkward as hell... any trainer can teach fundamentals and all but fighting like them just cant be taught IMO...Comment
Comment