Can Andre Ward be considered great if......

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Larry the boss
    EDUCATED
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 90798
    • 6,419
    • 4,473
    • 2,500,480

    #11
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza
    He could always stay there and defend his title 20 times against bums.

    That makes you great, doesn't it?
    So you dont think Hopkins was great before moving up?

    Comment

    • -GDS-
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2010
      • 1975
      • 52
      • 28
      • 9,901

      #12
      Originally posted by IronDanHamza
      He could always stay there and defend his title 20 times against bums.

      That makes you great, doesn't it?
      I was cringing as I used "Hopkin's style run", thinking of that.

      Comment

      • Check_hooks
        The Don of NSB
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2010
        • 12099
        • 966
        • 1,875
        • 25,959

        #13
        he'll be this generations calzaghe if he stays

        Comment

        • Capaedia
          JMM Stan
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2011
          • 2847
          • 185
          • 396
          • 9,501

          #14
          Pretty much all of the heavyweight ATGs were one-division champs.

          I don't see why not. But I think Ward will go wandering upward as he gets older, and good luck to him.

          Comment

          • IronDanHamza
            BoxingScene Icon
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 49445
            • 5,022
            • 269
            • 104,043

            #15
            Originally posted by Larryx2011
            So you dont think Hopkins was great before moving up?
            Why does that mean I think Hopkins wasn't great before he moved up?

            To answer your question I would say yes considering he was a Top 10 or at the very least an arguable Top 10 ATG Middleweight before he moved up from 160.

            Comment

            • Larry the boss
              EDUCATED
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 90798
              • 6,419
              • 4,473
              • 2,500,480

              #16
              Originally posted by IronDanHamza
              Why does that mean I think Hopkins wasn't great before he moved up?

              To answer your question I would say yes considering he was a Top 10 or at the very least an arguable Top 10 ATG Middleweight before he moved up from 160.
              cause i know you are taking shots at Calzaghe and he and hopkins both stayed in 1 division and cleaned it out.

              Comment

              • IronDanHamza
                BoxingScene Icon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 49445
                • 5,022
                • 269
                • 104,043

                #17
                Originally posted by Larryx2011
                cause i know you are taking shots at Calzaghe and he and hopkins both stayed in 1 division and cleaned it out.
                How do you know I'm not taking shots at Sven Ottke?

                Difference between Hopkins and Calzaghe is that almost 50 percent of Hopkins title defenses were against Top 5 opposition one of which was against a legit HOF'er and boaderline ATG in his prime or close to his prime as opposed to Calzaghe who fought an almighty 2 fighters ranked in the Top 5 at 168 and a grand total of 0 HOF fighters in general during his reign.

                Not really comparable reigns.

                Ottke and Calzaghe though their title reigns are like two peas in a pod except Calzaghe is a little bit better quality of pea.

                Comment

                • Mike Haynes
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Oct 2011
                  • 1593
                  • 128
                  • 12
                  • 10,954

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Russian Crushin
                  Is Hagler great?
                  Absolutely. Hagler had sixty something fights at middleweight and fought some great competition (that moved up) throughout his career.

                  Ward has nothing left to prove at 168 and we haven't found the beast at 160who's moving up in weight that would be a threat to Ward. Plus there is a lot of competition at 175 in America.

                  Comment

                  • Larry the boss
                    EDUCATED
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 90798
                    • 6,419
                    • 4,473
                    • 2,500,480

                    #19
                    Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                    How do you know I'm not taking shots at Sven Ottke?

                    Difference between Hopkins and Calzaghe is that almost 50 percent of Hopkins title defenses were against Top 5 opposition one of which was against a legit HOF'er and boaderline ATG in his prime or close to his prime as opposed to Calzaghe who fought an almighty 2 fighters ranked in the Top 5 at 168 and a grand total of 0 HOF fighters in general during his reign.

                    Not really comparable reigns.

                    Ottke and Calzaghe though their title reigns are like two peas in a pod except Calzaghe is a little bit better quality of pea.
                    who is that?????

                    Comment

                    • Spray_resistant
                      Vacant interim regular(C)
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 29608
                      • 2,972
                      • 1,565
                      • 53,384

                      #20
                      Weight jumping is not at all important, I judge fighter by the wins over the fighters they beat and how good those fighters were then they beat them.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP