Originally posted by Tmann400
View Post
They have actually been fighting the best available opposition, given their monetary restraints. Showtime's and HBO's decision to refuse to televise Froch-Bute has made the fight difficult to make.
In contrast, Al Haymon-managed fighters can afford the best opponents because of HBO money, but more often than not, they end up facing soft opposition!
Most of the top 25 heavyweights and ranked HW contenders would have jumped at the chance to be Mitchell's opponent on HBO for a good payday, but instead they chose Witherspoon so they can be certain Mitchell wins. But fights where you know for certain who is going to win beforehand do poor ratings.
Mitchell-Witherspoon is fine as an undercard fight, but it shouldn't be televised. However, Mitchell-Chambers or Mitchell-Arreola would be good matchups for HBO to televise, because those would be COMPETITIVE fights.
Comment