Comments Thread For: Tim Bradley: If I Take Pacquiao's Power, It's a Long Night!

[Rome-By-Ko]

You're in for a rude awakening if you think Pac isn't a counter puncher and can't fight off the back foot.

Trust me I was saying the same thing before Ricky fought him.

I see a similar ending for your boy.

Hatton has no defense,fights nothing like Bradley but ok...

[Rome-By-Ko]

i'm looking forward to seeing what Rome is going to say after Bradley gets battered and possibly stopped

Me too,a little weird that your waiting to hear what I have to say...But to each it's own..

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Hatton has no defense,fights nothing like Bradley but ok...

Never said he did. Im saying he thought that Pac couldnt counter punch. Bradley is not a defensive wizard either. Hes gonna get knocked out by uppercuts. His punches are too wide.

[mathed]

well he's saying "if" is because the last time @ 147 he got hurt by Abregus power

he even admitted that Abregu hurt him.............

He wobbled Abregu several times in that fight and dominated him in an 11-1 UD worst case. Who hasn't been able to take Pac's power but Hatton? He has broken everyone else down over the long haul and especially when they tried to out punch him. Even David Diaz almost went the distance with him.

Pac has a great pop but he isn't known for one punch KO's....instead he busts you up over the distance. Bradley hardly gets touched in fights, his defense is probably the most underrated in the entire game.

He is saying if Pac hurts him with every punch, then he will be ready to switch to another technique..........unlike Cotto, Clottey, Hatton, DLH, Mosley and Margs.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Never said he did. Im saying he thought that Pac couldnt counter punch. Bradley is not a defensive wizard either. Hes gonna get knocked out by uppercuts. His punches are too wide.

40mill he does not get stop,you in??

[Dirk Diggler UK]

40mill he does not get stop,you in??

You have less faith in Bradley than he does in himself

[IronDanHamza]

I came in here to say the same thing. If a fighter is talking about "if's" and "someone's getting knocked out, either me or my opponent". That says they're not 100 percent confident in their ability and have doubts about themselves.

He did the same thing with Khan. "If I lose to Khan, the Pacquiao fight won't be there anymore".

He's too iffy about his abilities. I feel he's gonna win but he has to stop with his if's, he's too nice and respectable in a sport where controversy mostly is what gets you popular.

I think it's because he knows that Khan and Pacquaio are two fights that he certainly could lose.

Especially Pacquiao.

[Rome-By-Ko]

You have less faith in Bradley than he does in himself

I guess you don't believe Pac will ko Bradley after all..Cool..I don't see it happening either..

[LeG00N]

I guess you don't believe Pac will ko Bradley after all..Cool..I don't see it happening either..

i'll give you 10:1 odds on Pacquiao stopping Bradley if you want

[Mister Wolf]

Never said he did. Im saying he thought that Pac couldnt counter punch. Bradley is not a defensive wizard either. Hes gonna get knocked out by uppercuts. His punches are too wide.

Not a defensive wizard but a good defensive fighter, way better than amir khan just ask Lamont Peterson.