Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why does Pac deserve props for Bradley fight?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by SekondzOut View Post
    giving fighters props for ish they're SUPPOSED to do is the new school way....so being a fan of the sport in the "DIVA" and "BOXING IS A BUSINESS" era we find ourselves giving props we shouldn't give.....I can't speak for ALL boxing heads but I know most dudes just LOVE the "he don't have a fanbase or sale seats" excuse to duck fights these days...oh man, that one is so new school!!!....shoutout to the oldschool...I miss it!!
    Great post!, i agree with you 100%, why in the hell people give props to boxers to do his job?. i never understood that. You know why im grateful? for Pac NOT fighting with Cotto, that was a real ****ty fight. Give props to Pac to do what he supposed to do?.....Nah....

    I will tell the TS this tough, Pacman-Bradley fight is a GOOD fight, deal with it!

    Comment


    • #32
      Bradley is a relatively young, pretty skilled, undefeated, with a good resume, hungry for money and glory. But nothing will help him avoid destruction at the hands of Pacquiao. When Bradley wakes up, he will realize that Pac is on an entirely different level.

      Comment


      • #33
        Sadly, he's take a hit in his ATG standing in his last fights... And not being willing to face an opponent at 154 makes you a fraud at that weight, he's only a 7 weightdivision champ in my eyes.

        Comment


        • #34
          Pac vs bradley>floyd vs cotto and its not even close

          Bradley is a unbeaten top notch fighter , cotto is not.
          Its not that cotto lost its in the way he lost.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by 110110110 View Post
            Pac vs bradley>floyd vs cotto and its not even close

            Bradley is a unbeaten top notch fighter , cotto is not.
            Its not that cotto lost its in the way he lost.
            Pac is always taking tougher fights than Floyd. Bradley is unbeaten, and perhaps no one can beat him. But Cotto should be a test for Floyd in that Floyd is still an unknown quantity as he doesnt fight regularly enough for people to gauge where he is at.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
              Pac is always taking tougher fights than Floyd. Bradley is unbeaten, and perhaps no one can beat him. But Cotto should be a test for Floyd in that Floyd is still an unknown quantity as he doesnt fight regularly enough for people to gauge where he is at.
              Not sure if serious....

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by PAC-BOY View Post
                Shane Mosley: After loss to Mayweather had win over Mora. Moras only loss at the time coming from Forrest. The man Mosley never could defeat. Also Mora had a win over Forrest. So he didnt suffer greatly after a decision loss over Mayweather. He had a good win afterwards. Pacquiao also dropped Mosley! Mosley rocked Mayweather. Point made!
                Margarito: you laugh...is a threat to any fighter. Hes a Mexican warrior. To laugh is to say hes a bum club fighter. Not Many fighter will fight guys that are a threat with a sizable reach height and weight advantage. To do so and to totally wreck their opponents face is pretty good. Its easy to discredit. Point Made!
                JMM: @ WW only huh? How many times is he gonna beat his guy. The judges didnt see it in JMM favor. Punch stats were in Mannys favor. The limitations of Manny were not lived up too this night and appeared lack lusterd. Giving haters an excuse to hate. It happens. He won...3 times arguably.
                For Bradley: Hes an undefeated Champ thats deserving of an chance. A good fighter that wants to prove hes great. Thats a dangerous fighter. Props to Manny for taking a prime undefeated Champ ranked #1 in his division instead of soft fights to retirement. Point Made!
                Triangle theories aren't they great

                Comment


                • #38
                  I give Pacquaio as much credit for Bradley as I do for Mayweather beating Ortiz.

                  I agree, Bradley is a solid fight for Pacquaio but it certainly isn't an amazing win.

                  It's the best available and a good win.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                    Pac is always taking tougher fights than Floyd. Bradley is unbeaten, and perhaps no one can beat him. But Cotto should be a test for Floyd in that Floyd is still an unknown quantity as he doesnt fight regularly enough for people to gauge where he is at.
                    Not sure if you are being funny or if you really believe the s**t you spit.

                    FACTS.........

                    Bradley is the first prime opponent Manny has fought since Jorge Solis.
                    Bradley is the best opponent Manny has fought since Marquez in 08'.
                    Bradley is the first legit fight Manny has picked since Cotto in 09'.

                    Clottey, Margarito at 150, Mosley, and Marquez at 144 were ALL s**t fights, c'mon. Clottey was a C pick. Margarito at 150 was a C-/C as well. Mosley was a C-/C at best. And going in, Marquez was a D+/C-. The only time JMM had fought at 144 was against Floyd, when he was 2 1/2 years younger, and he got shutout. Everyone thought Marquez was a s**t pick going in and that he'd get steam rolled.

                    Bradley is more along the lines of when Floyd fouhgt Ricky Hatton. An A- fight and a really good pick for Manny. Bradley is unbeaten, Hatton was unbeaten. Bradley is #9 P4P, Hatton was #8 P4P. Bradley has fought once before at 147 against Abregu, Hatton had fought once before at 147 against Collazo. Bradley is prime, Hatton was prime. Bradley has good wins over Witter, Holt, Abregu, Peterson, Alexander. Hatton had good wins over Tszyu, Maussa, Collazo, and Urango. It's more along the lines of that if you are being an unbias poster, which I know you have struggled with being at times......

                    Floyd is still an unknown quantity?????? That's ludicrous and asinine. Floyd came back off of 21 months of retirement and shutout Marquez at 144, which I called a C fight at first as well. But, given that an even older JMM arguably just beat Manny at the same weight......I don't know man.

                    Floyd then turned around and fought Mosley, who people forget was #9 P4P at the time and coming off good wins over Mayorga and Margarito, and when Manny refused to fight him at anything other than 142 lbs (get real), and beat him handily. He then turned around and came back off 16 months to fight Victor Ortiz, coming off 5 straight wins (1 over Berto to make him unanimously the next best WW besides Floyd and Manny) and a draw he should have won over Lamont Peterson, which looks better now right???

                    Floyd fighting Ortiz and Mosley when he did, was light years better than Manny fighting Clottey, Margarito, and Mosley when he did. And they both fought Marquez at 144, and we saw how that played out.

                    To say Floyd is an unproven/unknown quantity is ridiculous.

                    Once Floyd gets Cotto on his resume while he's still good and at 154, you will turn around and say it was a bulls**t fight and how he doesn't take risks. You know it, I know it, everybody with an account who posts on NSB knows it.

                    May-Cotto at 154 and Pac-Bradley, both are very good fights, and the best for what was there right now, besides each other of course. Only the bias haters and fans of both are knocking either fight.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      lol the ts is being a swagger jacker.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP