Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is it conceivable that Arum would pay a fighter to lose?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    U guys notice the new excuses from these *****tards, first it was because PAC is juicing then now that PAC made it clear he has no problem with ost, so now it's bob paid off pac's opponent lol.. What's the next excuses? PAC is not even human? Lmao!!

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by PACsmash View Post
      It's funny how *****s like to assume things. Didnt PAC ducked Floyd to fight clottey cause clottey was a easy opponent? All of a sudden now clottey is mr.bad Ass who bob paid to throw the fight away? Lol.. U know how silly u sound, again u think arum would go and tell Marquez that arum paid off the judges because " it's business" hahahah... Guess what pac was suppose to KO Marquez that didn't happen did arum paid PAC off also??
      Wtf are you even talking about? You're making up random **** to continue arguing with yourself, while quoting me for some reason. Most of what u just said you just made up in your head. Lmao

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by jcpryor View Post
        Wtf are you even talking about? You're making up random **** to continue arguing with yourself, while quoting me for some reason. Most of what u just said you just made up in your head. Lmao
        Name one thing i said that was made up?? when PAC beat clottey the *****s was saying its because clottey is an easy opponent that's why PAC ducked Floyd to go fight clottey instead. I'm making this up? Now fast foward a couple years later it's bob arum paid clottey to throw the fight off?? lol make up ur mind! according to u if any of pac's opponent doesn't look good then the fight was fixed but if and I repeat if PAC struggles a lil then PAC just got exposed!!

        P.s. u quoted me first now u can't defend your stance so now I'm making ***** up?
        Last edited by PACsmash; 02-09-2012, 01:55 PM.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by tredh View Post
          LLS at the bold you think King is unsavory but not Arum.
          All these promoters are cooked. You think King and Arum are unsavory but not Golden Boy, Dibella, Shaw, even a guy as powerful as Haymon?

          Comment


          • #85
            I have no knowledge of the situation with Clottey or Marquez but I do know that Bob Arum has been in trouble for bribery and he was raided by the feds for an investigation of fight fixing. He is certianly capable of doing something like paying someone to take a dive. JMM vs Likar Ramos looked like a fixed fight. For Tim Bradley, I don't think he's a cash whore. He wants to get paid and he wants to be recognized as one of the best so I don't think Bob Arum can offer him enough $$$ to take a dive in June. I think if he loses, it'll be because he got beat, period.

            Comment


            • #86
              Lol at the *******s trying to deny all chances of Clottey being bought out.

              He has an interview where he specifically stated "Something told me that I have to lose that night"

              He's been giving signs ever since.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by I'm so sorry View Post
                Lol at the *******s trying to deny all chances of Clottey being bought out.

                He has an interview where he specifically stated "Something told me that I have to lose that night"

                He's been giving signs ever since.
                I really doubt he was though. He fought just like Clottey that night. There was nothing su****ious in that fight for me anyways.

                Now Marquez-Ramos, I think that was fixed.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by PBFP4P View Post
                  I really doubt he was though. He fought just like Clottey that night. There was nothing su****ious in that fight for me anyways.

                  Now Marquez-Ramos, I think that was fixed.
                  That was blatantly fixed. Most blatant since Hopkins-DLH IMO

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by SekondzOut View Post
                    LMAO
                    Hey, bro...in your list of favorite fighters you have 'upmost' and it should be 'utmost'

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                      That was blatantly fixed. Most blatant since Hopkins-DLH IMO
                      How was that fixed?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP