U guys notice the new excuses from these *****tards, first it was because PAC is juicing then now that PAC made it clear he has no problem with ost, so now it's bob paid off pac's opponent lol.. What's the next excuses? PAC is not even human? Lmao!!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is it conceivable that Arum would pay a fighter to lose?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by PACsmash View PostIt's funny how *****s like to assume things. Didnt PAC ducked Floyd to fight clottey cause clottey was a easy opponent? All of a sudden now clottey is mr.bad Ass who bob paid to throw the fight away? Lol.. U know how silly u sound, again u think arum would go and tell Marquez that arum paid off the judges because " it's business" hahahah... Guess what pac was suppose to KO Marquez that didn't happen did arum paid PAC off also??
Comment
-
Originally posted by jcpryor View PostWtf are you even talking about? You're making up random **** to continue arguing with yourself, while quoting me for some reason. Most of what u just said you just made up in your head. Lmao
P.s. u quoted me first now u can't defend your stance so now I'm making ***** up?Last edited by PACsmash; 02-09-2012, 01:55 PM.
Comment
-
-
I have no knowledge of the situation with Clottey or Marquez but I do know that Bob Arum has been in trouble for bribery and he was raided by the feds for an investigation of fight fixing. He is certianly capable of doing something like paying someone to take a dive. JMM vs Likar Ramos looked like a fixed fight. For Tim Bradley, I don't think he's a cash whore. He wants to get paid and he wants to be recognized as one of the best so I don't think Bob Arum can offer him enough $$$ to take a dive in June. I think if he loses, it'll be because he got beat, period.
Comment
-
Originally posted by I'm so sorry View PostLol at the *******s trying to deny all chances of Clottey being bought out.
He has an interview where he specifically stated "Something told me that I have to lose that night"
He's been giving signs ever since.
Now Marquez-Ramos, I think that was fixed.
Comment
-
Comment