Which Welter List is Better for Floyd?

[daggum]

baldomir trumps all

[4Corners]

LOL, you can't help yourself.

5 vs 4 is hardly fair and why take Marquez out and not Mosley.

But I want to keep it simple and to the point, and that which of the lists are better the ones Floyd fought or the ones he didn't.

Be interested to hear from the person that voted for the list that Floyd fought.

Wasn't me, I didn't even vote on the poll to be honest.

I took Marquez out so Pac could even have a chance. Floyd dominated Marquez at 144, pac arguably lost.

Probably the ones he didn't, but only a fool wouldn't be able to realize Pacquiao, Margarito, and Cotto were all Top Rank.

[Bushbaby]

Anyway, realistically Floyd's welterweight run is littered with champions that he beat. 2 were lineal if I'm not mistaken. Meanwhile Pacman never actually beat a champion at welterweight without a mannyweight. So all in all at welterweight or above, Floyd still sons Manny.

[CHOWWOKKA]

Anyway, realistically Floyd's welterweight run is littered with champions that he beat. 2 were lineal if I'm not mistaken. Meanwhile Pacman never actually beat a champion at welterweight without a mannyweight. So all in all at welterweight or above, Floyd still sons Manny.

^ I agree with this

[D4thincarnation]

Anyway, realistically Floyd's welterweight run is littered with champions that he beat. 2 were lineal if I'm not mistaken. Meanwhile Pacman never actually beat a champion at welterweight without a mannyweight. So all in all at welterweight or above, Floyd still sons Manny.

Some people can't help themselves.

Can you only judge Floyd by comparing to Manny.

Well that could be the case for future boxing historians.

All this thread is about is a simple question, which list is better.


I'll rank each list side by side.

1 Pacquiao
2 Cotto.
3 Williams
4 Margarito
5 Mosley
6 Judah
7 Hatton
8 Ortiz

[PAC-BOY]

Anyway, realistically Floyd's welterweight run is littered with champions that he beat. 2 were lineal if I'm not mistaken. Meanwhile Pacman never actually beat a champion at welterweight without a mannyweight. So all in all at welterweight or above, Floyd still sons Manny.

Floyd fought bum champs with **** resumes thats why Floyd gets a bad rap with everyone except his followers...manny fought everyone floyd ducked. Floyd retired because there were no more bums to take on. The biggest threats were looking for Floyd and he cried and retired...until everyone went on with their business. LOL then he comes back and Manny was there. There is a big reason why Floyd only has fought 7 times within 7 years.

[ModernTalking]

Anyway, realistically Floyd's welterweight run is littered with champions that he beat. 2 were lineal if I'm not mistaken. Meanwhile Pacman never actually beat a champion at welterweight without a mannyweight. So all in all at welterweight or above, Floyd still sons Manny.

Floyd can clean out the welter division and he still wouldn't be half the fighter of what PAC is. The only way for Floyd to even up or go pass PAC is if he moves up to heavyweight and knock out Monte Barrett. Remember what Floyd said: What PAC is doing would be equivalent to as if I was knocking out heavyweight.

[SaintGeorge]

Floyd Mayweather would beat every single person on that last, past or present.

Therefore Floyd> The rest.

The only fighter on that list that gives him problems is Manny 2 years ago, that's a 60/40 fight in Floyd's favour, right now it's a 95/5 fight in favour of Floyd. Cotto would of had his head boxed off, likewise Mararito. Williams size would of give Floyd some problems early round, but him and his corners are thinkers. Floyd would of KO'D him late. Don't really see your point anyway because at the time of fighting Hatton it was a huge fight, much bigger than Floyd v any of them bar Manny, Ortiz was a riskier fight than what a Margarito or Cotto would of been IMO.

[D4thincarnation]

Floyd Mayweather would beat every single person on that last, past or present.

Therefore Floyd> The rest.

The only fighter on that list that gives him problems is Manny 2 years ago, that's a 60/40 fight in Floyd's favour, right now it's a 95/5 fight in favour of Floyd. Cotto would of had his head boxed off, likewise Mararito. Williams size would of give Floyd some problems early round, but him and his corners are thinkers. Floyd would of KO'D him late. Don't really see your point anyway because at the time of fighting Hatton it was a huge fight, much bigger than Floyd v any of them bar Manny, Ortiz was a riskier fight than what a Margarito or Cotto would of been IMO.

One thing winning a fight on paper quite another winning it in the ring.

Shall we judge all fighters on how we think they will do against other fighters, or should we start demanding the fights that should be made.

Is it any wonder why the big fights in boxing fail to materialize when so many are just happy with fantasy fights.

Let judge fighters on what they have done not on what we think they can do.

[immortal tech]

I don't know, love is blind after all.

Floyd should have Cotto and Pacquiao on his resume those are two blockbuster fights that was in demand by fight fans and should've happened already as far as Margarito not really he got overrated after the fact and Williams was a freak too risky of a fight for everybody at WW and he brought nothing to the table don't blame anybody for not taking it.