Bradley vs Pacquaio dont get it twisted

[IMDAZED]

You just said Clottey was legit....sigh...okay bud..later..i don't have time for this....wishing for Pacquiao-Bradley...so Pacquiao legitimize his claim at 140...later...until next time my little grasshopper...u always make me laugh with your whimsicalness....you're like a little brother i like to slap around...peace.

You must be strugg. Have to be. Either that or your posting from Manila. Maybe both.

[915angel]

gettin off topic i felt clottey was robbed in the cotto fight lol

[IMDAZED]

gettin off topic i felt clottey was robbed in the cotto fight lol

Clottey robbed himself as usual.

[Clegg]

Bradley is a very good fighter and would be a good win, but this isn't the ideal time to face him.

You wanna fight Bradley instead of Shane? Great. You wanna fight Bradley instead of Margarito? Fantastic. Bradley instead of a blown-up JMM? Good stuff.

But when you pick Bradley instead Mayweather, that's not so good.

I rate Bradley highly and I think he has a good chance of winning. The guy who said he can only fight one way can't have seen many of his performances. He always comes to win, he adjusts during fights, he's good enough that he can throw a lot of punches but still be hard to catch clean, he's good on the inside and outside.

But those things get forgotten when you remember that there are even more positive things you can say about Floyd and so Pac-Bradley just seems like a consolation prize in comparison.

Another thing I'd say: you can tell when a boxer is cherry-picking because his fans talk up the guy he's fighting before the fight.

When a fight is evenly-matched on paper, the fans of each guy talk shit about the other and predict one-sided KO wins. When it isn't, the fans of the big name favourite work hard to talk up the opponent's chances, talking as if they're promoters or something. Sadly this something like the 4th or 5th Pac fight in a row where we've had threads like this.

Oh, and the fact that Floyd started at a lower weight than Hatton didn't change the fact that he got criticised for facing him at 147, and the exact same thing is true of Pac-Bradley so you guys can enjoy suddenly changing your tune on that issue. Actually, Pac thought it was fair for Cotto to have to come down to 145, so I'm sure he'll happily do the same for Bradley, right?

[Simply Zyzz]

who the *** has bradley beat to get a fight with pacquiao???/ this is just another inhouse fight by that ***** arum....

and im not saying this fight will do clottey numbers, but arum better be ready to open his wallet for some serious promotion because, nobody... and i mean nobody outside this forum knows who this guy is.... not too long ago he said himself he would walk around his city and nobody knew him....

[mathed]

Pac isn't walking through Bradley. If Diaz can almost last the entire fight, then Bradley will make it come down to the cards.

[Kuyukut]

You must be strugg. Have to be. Either that or your posting from Manila. Maybe both.

how about you... are you posting from timbuktu or you're just ******ed. Probably both.

[Mister Wolf]

And who the hell wants to see Bradley? What you have done is you have taken from the list of fighters that are talked about as the next opponents for Pacquaio and have talked yourself into believing they are good matchups when they are not. This is one more example of another cherry picked opponent that is a million to one shot.

If you are OK with Pacquaio fighting mediocre opposition that's fine - but I'm not. And you talk about Alvarez not deserving that fight? And Bradley does based on what? His incredible win over bum Alexander or his career defining showdown with 49 year old Joel Casamayor?

Get real.

And please tell me who canelo alvarez beat that gets him a fight with pac. Kermit Cintron? Alfonso Gomez? Let me guess he deserves the fight cause he has red hair haha. Bradley has a waaaaaay better resume than alvarez sir.