Pacquiaos on the decline, agree?

[thatman22]

I disagree-He is the same as ever before, technically speaking. His right hand is the same as always too, as was shown in the JMM fight...Pac is no better than he was in JMM 2..He is the same..No less and no more.

[The Big Dunn]

i never said shot, dont put words in my mouth.

I said "decline". Hes far from shot.

I said pac fans, not oxn? don't put words in mine.

That said I doubt if any pac fans will admit manny's shortcomings inside the ring.

[ИATAS]

IMDAZED has been saying for 2-3 years or so now that Floyd is on the decline. He's about 2 years older than pacquiao, so naturally he would say pacquiao is still at his absolute prime!

IMDAZED logic:

Pac not looking good against mosley - "Mosley's movement caused it, that's the same old pacquiao"

Floyd almost getting KO'd by mosley - "Clearly Floyd is on the decline, I can see it."

[IMDAZED]

IMDAZED has been saying for 2-3 years or so now that Floyd is on the decline. He's about 2 years older than pacquiao, so naturally he would say pacquiao is still at his absolute prime!

IMDAZED logic:

Pac not looking good against mosley - "Mosley's movement caused it"

Floyd almost getting KO'd by mosley - "Clearly Floyd is on the decline, I can see it."

When did I say that? Never? Ahh ok.

At least offer a real reason why I said that. No need to make **** up, Nata*******.

[Oxn]

I said pac fans, not oxn? don't put words in mine.

That said I doubt if any pac fans will admit manny's shortcomings inside the ring.

I apologize but next time dont quote me when making that statement as it confuses me.

[ИATAS]

When did I say that? Never? Ahh ok.

At least offer a real reason why I said that. No need to make **** up, Nata*******.

You've been saying Floyd is on the decline for 2+ years.

[hi-five]

it's pretty obvious that Pac's on the decline. That's why him and mayweather should fight soon while the interest is still there.

[IMDAZED]

You've been saying Floyd is on the decline for 2+ years.

Longer than that. Not for the reason you mentioned though. So what was your point?

[ИATAS]

Longer than that. Not for the reason you mentioned though. So what was your point?

ah ok. So Floyd started his physical decline at around age 28-29, and Pacquiao at 33 is at his absolute physical peek of his career, never been faster or stronger this is the best he's ever been right now. Got it!

[IMDAZED]

ah ok. So Floyd started his physical decline at around age 28-29, and Pacquiao at 33 is at his absolute physical peek of his career, never been faster or stronger this is the best he's ever been right now. Got it!

Age is relative. But...let's see.

First you invent a BS reason I never said because...?

Now you're putting further words in my mouth.

Do you have a point, Nata*******? Or just feeling sore because I don't believe Pacquiao has slipped physically? Why not just ask me why I feel the way I do (about both Floyd and Pac)...rather than being just another b*tch made *******?