Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao, Arum Show United Front on Mayweather Terms

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Pogue69 View Post
    What about when Bob Arum locked in Cowboy Stadium for March 13, 2010? Floyd refused and was called every name in the book. If Arum and PAc can do it, why can't mayweather?
    hey dumb, its Floyds team who locked MArch 13 and Pac team bite that bluff even Pac came from bloody fight against cotto. The cowboy stadium is just an option venue to accomodate SUPER MEGA fight but GBP duck it and cancel the same day that they supposed to be meet with the owner of cowboy stadium!

    Comment


    • We know Arum is greedy...so is Pac and Mayweather. Pac talks about 50-50 and Mayweather talks about making money from every hot dog sold....big fking deal. The question is if Mayweather can fight in late May or Pac can fight May 5th. How much they get isn't going to stop the fight cause they will not make anywhere near that fighting another fighter.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Oxn View Post
        So because Bob arum tried that approach and it didnt work, now Floyd shud try that approach knowing its not going to work?

        ***** logic.
        No. What I am saying is that Mayweather was called a "ducker" when that all happened. Now that Pacquiao is the one refusing, does that standard and term now apply to him? I'm not saying who is right or wrong, just asking for some consistency.

        Funny thing is, I don't even like Mayweather. I think he is a jackass. However, like a typical Pac fanboy, you assume that anyone who disagrres with Arum or Pac is automatically a "*****". How old are you, 12?

        Comment


        • If Mayweather is 100% legally obligated to May 5 and Arum doesn't accept May 5th, we can ALL blame Arum and Pac. If Mayweather can fight late May and does not, we can ALL blame Mayweather. Simple as that folks. We should know within 24 hours.
          Last edited by richardt; 01-12-2012, 02:06 PM.

          Comment


          • Why is Pac and Arum worried about Mayweather guarantee money? This makes no sense to me. And if you accept the challenge there should be no buts.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by sapaw View Post
              hey dumb, its Floyds team who locked MArch 13 and Pac team bite that bluff even Pac came from bloody fight against cotto. The cowboy stadium is just an option venue to accomodate SUPER MEGA fight but GBP duck it and cancel the same day that they supposed to be meet with the owner of cowboy stadium!
              its so hard for them to except

              http://www.mp8.ph/

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Oxn View Post
                EXACTLY

                The judge gave him a date of June 1st to give Floyd some leeway(sp). Why would the judge give him a full month after the fight? If he was obligated to fight May 5th, then he should be in jail by May 12th; a full week after the fight.

                But instead the judge gave him a FULL MONTH to work out kinks usually associated in this type of processes. Things change, and it has which is why he got a full month.
                yeah this is my understanding of it. if floyd has to go to jail on june 1st then he can have the fight anytime before that. I don't think the judge stated that floyd absolutely has to fight on may 5th, just as long as he has a fight. But anyways, best to wait to read or hear what floyd says regarding arum's deal.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Pogue69 View Post
                  However, like a typical Pac fanboy, you assume that anyone who disagrres with Arum or Pac is automatically a "*****". How old are you, 12?
                  That goes for Mayweather fans too who group Pac fans with non Pac fans who are just making a point. Works both ways dude.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Pogue69 View Post
                    No. What I am saying is that Mayweather was called a "ducker" when that all happened. Now that Pacquiao is the one refusing, does that standard and term now apply to him? I'm not saying who is right or wrong, just asking for some consistency.

                    Funny thing is, I don't even like Mayweather. I think he is a jackass. However, like a typical Pac fanboy, you assume that anyone who disagrres with Arum or Pac is automatically a "*****". How old are you, 12?
                    What are you getting at? Have you been following the media, reading the threads?

                    Plenty of people are calling Manny a ducker right now, so yes the standards do apply. The tables have turned.

                    Infact when Arum set the clock, both were called duckers, and both should be called duckers now.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by richardt View Post
                      That goes for Mayweather fans too who group Pac fans with non Pac fans who are just making a point. Works both ways dude.
                      Agreed. However, the Pac fan I was responding to called me a ***** just because I disagreed with his point.

                      As I have stated, I am not a fan of any particular boxer. I am a fan of the sport.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP