Originally posted by Pogue69
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Pacquiao, Arum Show United Front on Mayweather Terms
Collapse
-
-
We know Arum is greedy...so is Pac and Mayweather. Pac talks about 50-50 and Mayweather talks about making money from every hot dog sold....big fking deal. The question is if Mayweather can fight in late May or Pac can fight May 5th. How much they get isn't going to stop the fight cause they will not make anywhere near that fighting another fighter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oxn View PostSo because Bob arum tried that approach and it didnt work, now Floyd shud try that approach knowing its not going to work?
***** logic.
Funny thing is, I don't even like Mayweather. I think he is a jackass. However, like a typical Pac fanboy, you assume that anyone who disagrres with Arum or Pac is automatically a "*****". How old are you, 12?
Comment
-
If Mayweather is 100% legally obligated to May 5 and Arum doesn't accept May 5th, we can ALL blame Arum and Pac. If Mayweather can fight late May and does not, we can ALL blame Mayweather. Simple as that folks. We should know within 24 hours.Last edited by richardt; 01-12-2012, 02:06 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sapaw View Posthey dumb, its Floyds team who locked MArch 13 and Pac team bite that bluff even Pac came from bloody fight against cotto. The cowboy stadium is just an option venue to accomodate SUPER MEGA fight but GBP duck it and cancel the same day that they supposed to be meet with the owner of cowboy stadium!
http://www.mp8.ph/
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oxn View PostEXACTLY
The judge gave him a date of June 1st to give Floyd some leeway(sp). Why would the judge give him a full month after the fight? If he was obligated to fight May 5th, then he should be in jail by May 12th; a full week after the fight.
But instead the judge gave him a FULL MONTH to work out kinks usually associated in this type of processes. Things change, and it has which is why he got a full month.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pogue69 View PostHowever, like a typical Pac fanboy, you assume that anyone who disagrres with Arum or Pac is automatically a "*****". How old are you, 12?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pogue69 View PostNo. What I am saying is that Mayweather was called a "ducker" when that all happened. Now that Pacquiao is the one refusing, does that standard and term now apply to him? I'm not saying who is right or wrong, just asking for some consistency.
Funny thing is, I don't even like Mayweather. I think he is a jackass. However, like a typical Pac fanboy, you assume that anyone who disagrres with Arum or Pac is automatically a "*****". How old are you, 12?
Plenty of people are calling Manny a ducker right now, so yes the standards do apply. The tables have turned.
Infact when Arum set the clock, both were called duckers, and both should be called duckers now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by richardt View PostThat goes for Mayweather fans too who group Pac fans with non Pac fans who are just making a point. Works both ways dude.
As I have stated, I am not a fan of any particular boxer. I am a fan of the sport.
Comment
Comment