Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Offense Is No Longer A Skill Of Boxing"-Haters

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Rassclot View Post
    incredible dumbass huh?


    Which asylum are you posting from?
    Oakland University, how bout yourself? Having fun raging from the depths of your parents basement?

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
      He did no such thing.
      From the Boxinghistorian.com

      "Oh, as to those other "did it happens?", here's the run down: Jack Dempsey did name himself after The Nonpareil Dempsey, he didn't put Plaster-of-Paris on his hands (an impossibility sworn to under oath by the inventor of the product), Louis did give a half-dollar to Marciano and another kid as they followed him around at a boxing show where he was guest announcer, Ali-Listion II drew only 2434 fans (the least ever), and Greb was blinded in one eye by Kid Norfolk in 1921, yet kept it a secret and fought successfully the final 5 years of his career and his life. And, of course, Willie Pep did win a round without landing a single punch."

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Larryx2011 View Post
        wow Whitaker had no offense??you can not be serious
        His offense lacked power.


        that is one of the most important attributes of offense. The great equilizer. the fire power.


        It's like a defensive fighter without head movement. Can you have great defense without any head movement?

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Rassclot View Post
          grow a brain.


          I never said it's the only measurement.


          It is the primary measurement. Power with Speed are the 2 most important aspects of great offense. Period.
          Do Brain's grow naturally are must I use some form of supplement? I'm assuming you're going off experience?

          A KO % is the primary measurement of someone's offensive ability?

          Again, plain idiocy. Nothing more, nothing less.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by Larryx2011 View Post
            wow Whitaker had no offense??you can not be serious
            Don't even bother...

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Rassclot View Post
              Without power you'd be Paulie Malignaggi. He's got speed and placement. Does he win fights at the highest level?


              Even Whitaker doesn't win fights at the highest level. I know you nuthuggers love to overrate him. Sorry clowns, he lost because his offense lacked.
              Andre Ward doesn't have great power.

              He's the best SMW in the world.

              Floyd Mayweather doesn't have great power, he's one of the best fighter in the world.

              Bernard Hopkins doesn't have great power, he's still dominating at 47 years old.

              You don't have to have power to have offense, or to win fights.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Johnwoo8686 View Post
                From the Boxinghistorian.com

                "Oh, as to those other "did it happens?", here's the run down: Jack Dempsey did name himself after The Nonpareil Dempsey, he didn't put Plaster-of-Paris on his hands (an impossibility sworn to under oath by the inventor of the product), Louis did give a half-dollar to Marciano and another kid as they followed him around at a boxing show where he was guest announcer, Ali-Listion II drew only 2434 fans (the least ever), and Greb was blinded in one eye by Kid Norfolk in 1921, yet kept it a secret and fought successfully the final 5 years of his career and his life. And, of course, Willie Pep did win a round without landing a single punch."
                exceptions do not make the rule.


                if he didn't throw a punch for every round. he would lose.

                defense does not win fights.


                kthanksbye.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Rassclot View Post
                  His offense lacked power.


                  that is one of the most important attributes of offense. The great equilizer. the fire power.


                  It's like a defensive fighter without head movement. Can you have great defense without any head movement?
                  He was a points fighter, didn't really need a great deal of power to win because of his speed and reflexes just enough to get respect.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Timing & Accuracy > Speed & Power

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by reedickyaluss View Post
                      Andre Ward doesn't have great power.

                      He's the best SMW in the world.

                      Floyd Mayweather doesn't have great power, he's one of the best fighter in the world.

                      Bernard Hopkins doesn't have great power, he's still dominating at 47 years old.

                      You don't have to have power to have offense, or to win fights.
                      The FOTD = Pacquiao. The last FOTD = RJJJr.

                      Both with great offense.

                      That's right.

                      you listed fighters with great defensive and subpar offensive abilities.


                      They can still win fights.


                      However, their offense are solid B and under. they do not have A class offense.


                      Can we agree on that?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP