Comments Thread For: Mike Tyson: The Klitschko Brothers Get The Job Done
Collapse
-
-
The klitchko bros can't be any worse then Buster Douglas.
Comment
-
He WAS dominating: aka: winning all but a round or two.
Just because Byrd was able to connect a few times more than normal after Vitali's injury became more unbearable doesn't have any weight in the debate. Vitali easily beats him if the injury doesn't occur.
I know it, you know it, everyone else on here knows it so just accept it and admitt it.Comment
-
Were you aware that there was a confirmed severely torn rotator cuff after the fight?Typical boxrec/wikipedia scholar gibberish.
If you watched that fight (which you didn't), and had Vitali winning handily, i question whether you even know what the hell you're watching, or if you even have an understanding of how to score a fight properly.
THERE WAS NO INJURY. And every single round was competitive from the outset. Vitali, who is used to everything going his way when he fights his usual crop of fat, talentless, glorified tomato cans, was getting embarrassed the entire fight, and pulled a NO MAS.
If he was injured so bad, he would've been rushed immediately to the emergency room instead of sticking around for post-fight interviews and the like.
He's a natural middleweight (won an Olympic medal at Middleweight) who should've campaigned at Light-Heavyweight who basically ate his way up to a division he had no business in.
All the rest prove you just have no business talking with me so I'll just play like you are trying to seem unintelligent on purpose like you come off. (nobody is this naive)Comment
-
Fair statement with the exception of Buster Douglas being better than the Klitschko brothers, which is exactly what your post represents.
It's garbage. Tyson could have beaten Wlad by aggression if he didn't get caught, but would get waxed by any version of Vitali.Last edited by Mr. Invincible; 01-06-2012, 02:46 PM.Comment
-
Again, post the fight. Vitali was not dominating which is why you won't post it.He WAS dominating: aka: winning all but a round or two.
Just because Byrd was able to connect a few times more than normal after Vitali's injury became more unbearable doesn't have any weight in the debate. Vitali easily beats him if the injury doesn't occur.
I know it, you know it, everyone else on here knows it so just accept it and admitt it.Comment
-
Wlad would not take Tyson out with one shot. Now you're talking ****** again.Fair statement with the exception of Buster Douglas being better than the Klitschko brothers, which is exactly what you post represents.
It's garbage. Tyson could have beaten Wlad by aggression if he didn't get caught, but would get waxed by any version of Vitali.Comment
-
Comment
-
Don't underestimate Wlad's punching power, it's exeptionally good, better than Vitali's and he has a deadly straight right. Only thing is he doesn't tend to go for an early KO and instead breaks his opponent down round after round.Comment
-
Comment
Comment