JCC should have fought Tito in 93

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • spyvsspy
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2010
    • 1549
    • 148
    • 128
    • 2,054

    #11
    Tito FTW!!

    Comment

    • lefthookrightup
      Up and Comer
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Apr 2011
      • 58
      • 5
      • 0
      • 6,082

      #12
      Originally posted by xcaret v4
      chavez never duckd him u lying sack of shi*
      Yes he did, the fight was offered to chavez and chavez wanted no part of it, they both shared the same promoter, I count that as a duck

      Comment

      • crold1
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2005
        • 6354
        • 328
        • 122
        • 19,304

        #13
        Timeline is off here. He shouldn't have fought Tito in 93. That's preposterous. Tito won his first title in June 93, a month after Chavez-Alli. Chavez was signed to fight Pea in September of that year. That was the biggest non-Heavyweight PPV of all time and THE fight in boxing. Part of the deal with the WBC was to make his mandatory versus Randall after Pea. There was no way in hell Tito-Chavez in 93 made a lick of sense, was mentioned by anyone, or even remotely considered. By late 94, maybe it could have happened but 95 was more realistic. By 95, Chavez wouldn't have stood a chance there.

        Comment

        • JPRINCEOFBOXING
          Contender
          • Sep 2007
          • 261
          • 10
          • 0
          • 7,535

          #14
          Originally posted by crold1
          Timeline is off here. He shouldn't have fought Tito in 93. That's preposterous. Tito won his first title in June 93, a month after Chavez-Alli. Chavez was signed to fight Pea in September of that year. That was the biggest non-Heavyweight PPV of all time and THE fight in boxing. Part of the deal with the WBC was to make his mandatory versus Randall after Pea. There was no way in hell Tito-Chavez in 93 made a lick of sense, was mentioned by anyone, or even remotely considered. By late 94, maybe it could have happened but 95 was more realistic. By 95, Chavez wouldn't have stood a chance there.
          great post you know what you talking about

          Comment

          • Sifo
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2011
            • 2927
            • 335
            • 459
            • 11,024

            #15
            Ts and 2nd porgt r the same person true story

            Comment

            • J-Smooth
              Duncan is goat
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Oct 2011
              • 2551
              • 175
              • 85
              • 9,612

              #16
              Originally posted by crold1
              Timeline is off here. He shouldn't have fought Tito in 93. That's preposterous. Tito won his first title in June 93, a month after Chavez-Alli. Chavez was signed to fight Pea in September of that year. That was the biggest non-Heavyweight PPV of all time and THE fight in boxing. Part of the deal with the WBC was to make his mandatory versus Randall after Pea. There was no way in hell Tito-Chavez in 93 made a lick of sense, was mentioned by anyone, or even remotely considered. By late 94, maybe it could have happened but 95 was more realistic. By 95, Chavez wouldn't have stood a chance there.
              /end thread

              Comment

              • FirePunch
                Banned
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • May 2010
                • 882
                • 54
                • 21
                • 1,070

                #17
                Chavez the one time lightweight vs Tito a one time light heavyweight .


                Past prime chavez vs young tito what a dumb a s s thread .


                Geesh i wonder why Wilfredo Gomez ducked Erik Morales
                Last edited by FirePunch; 12-27-2011, 03:49 AM.

                Comment

                • LeG00N
                  All Time Great
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 20386
                  • 1,081
                  • 1,364
                  • 25,738

                  #18
                  Tito wouldn't have beat him worse than Oscar.

                  Comment

                  • crold1
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2005
                    • 6354
                    • 328
                    • 122
                    • 19,304

                    #19
                    Originally posted by JPRINCEOFBOXING
                    great post you know what you talking about
                    Every once in a while.

                    Comment

                    • joseph5620
                      undisputed
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 15638
                      • 3,089
                      • 5,665
                      • 71,615

                      #20
                      Originally posted by MANIAC310
                      Tito wouldn't have beat him worse than Oscar.
                      Yes he would have.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP