Comments Thread For: Team Bute: Hopkins a Good "Plan B" if No Ward, Froch

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BoxingGenius27
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 8502
    • 370
    • 463
    • 9,603

    #271
    Originally posted by Larryx2011
    Hopkins would embarrass Bute
    But here's the thing larry.

    On one hand we have Bute saying Johnson is his "toughest" fight up to date. Then we have Bute fans admitting that Johnson is old, past prime and basically not the same Johnson he use to be; but glamorizing a Bute victory over Johnson as if he did something....

    We also have guys comparing the SS tourny to the Final Four with Mares, as if that's even up for discussion or comparison for that matter.

    We also have guys who are calling their "own" comments ******, moronic and idiotic.

    We're not even going to talk about the ones that choose to delete posts after they get embarrassed.....

    Def Comedy Jam baby. I love it lol
    Last edited by BoxingGenius27; 12-24-2011, 02:07 PM.

    Comment

    • LeadUppercut
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 13387
      • 305
      • 869
      • 13,720

      #272
      Originally posted by STONES!
      And I can agree with pretty much all of that.


      It's pretty easy for two guys to agree on this kind of thing when both are rational and making sense.
      It certainly makes it easier

      What did you think of my suggestion that if no Ward/Bute next, then I would prefer Kessler/Bute, and Froch/Bika on the undercard..... with the Kessler/Bute winner going on to face Ward?

      Froch/Bika? With the winner fighting the loser of Kessler/Bute for the #3 spot?

      Comment

      • turbotime
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2011
        • 3897
        • 64
        • 0
        • 4,167

        #273
        Originally posted by LeadUppercut
        It certainly makes it easier

        What did you think of my suggestion that if no Ward/Bute next, then I would prefer Kessler/Bute, and Froch/Bika on the undercard..... with the Kessler/Bute winner going on to face Ward?

        Froch/Bika? With the winner fighting the loser of Kessler/Bute for the #3 spot?
        Kessler won't fight Bute. Bute already tried to get that fight, Kessler didn't want to negotiate, and chose to fight Stigletz instead. Would be a good idea though.

        Comment

        • PEBBLES!
          Banned
          • Aug 2010
          • 6673
          • 463
          • 271
          • 14,623

          #274
          Originally posted by LeadUppercut
          It certainly makes it easier

          What did you think of my suggestion that if no Ward/Bute next, then I would prefer Kessler/Bute, and Froch/Bika on the undercard..... with the Kessler/Bute winner going on to face Ward?

          Froch/Bika? With the winner fighting the loser of Kessler/Bute for the #3 spot?
          Even if it wouldn't realistically happen, I'd like that double-header, especially if there were an agreement in place beforehand that the winner of the topside would get Ward - that latter circumstance would heat things up majorly.

          Froch-Bika would be a really interesting fight on the flip.

          Comment

          • BoxingGenius27
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 8502
            • 370
            • 463
            • 9,603

            #275
            Originally posted by jrosales13
            Again if Bute resume stinks then how in Gods name is he rank #1?

            Not by the rankings I created. I don't got that kind of pull to create these rankings.

            http://ring tv.craveonline.com/ratings/super-middleweight

            Again how is the #1 contender not deserving?

            vs....



            Originally posted by turbotime
            So? Rankings don't mean ****.

            LMAO Are we going by rankings or not??? lol

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP