Comments Thread For: Ward Dominates Froch, Wins The Super Six Boxing Classic
Collapse
-
-
Then stop pretending there's a significant size difference when there isn't.
Are you claiming it was taken? If it was taken then you can google for it as easily as I can. I wasn't aware that it was taken and I'm not your servant. Search for it yourself if it matters so much to you.Last edited by Dave Rado; 12-18-2011, 02:40 PM.Comment
-
Then stop pretending there's a significant size difference when there isn't.
Are you claiming it was taken? If it was taken then you can google for it as easily as I can. I wasn't aware that it was taken and I'm not your servant. Search for it yourself if it matters so much to you.Comment
-
The only objective evidence all points the other way. (a) They're in the same weight class. (b) Ward has fought above 168 more often than Froch has, both as an amateur and in the pros. (c) The tale of the tape shows that Ward has thicker legs and waist, while Froch has thicker arms and chest, which certainly is not evidence for either being bigger, and indicates to anyone who has no agenda that they just have different body shapes and that there's no evidence of either being bigger than the other. But you cherry-picked Froch's shoulders and chest and ignored the legs and waist, and when I produced the tale of the tape you said you'd already seen it. If you'd already seen it, why did you cherry pick Froch's chest and shoulders and ignore his waist and legs? Presumably to push your agenda in the face of all the evidence.Comment
-
You're the one saying one of them is bigger. Objectively they shouldn't be, as they're in the same weight class. If you want to claim they are bigger you have to have some evidence for it. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and you haven't produced any.
The only objective evidence all points the other way. (a) They're in the same weight class. (b) Ward has fought above 168 more often than Froch has, both as an amateur and in the pros. (c) The tale of the tape shows that Ward has thicker legs and waist, while Froch has thicker arms and chest, which certainly is not evidence for either being bigger, and indicates to anyone who has no agenda that they just have different body shapes and that there's no evidence of either being bigger than the other. But you cherry-picked Froch's shoulders and chest and ignored the legs and waist, and when I produced the tale of the tape you said you'd already seen it. If you'd already seen it, why did you cherry pick Froch's chest and shoulders and ignore his waist and legs? Presumably to push your agenda in the face of all the evidence.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment