Vitali Klitschko ALL TIME Boxing Records

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jcsuper
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2005
    • 2685
    • 200
    • 381
    • 9,253

    #81
    Posted by Jcsuper
    I got a question for you Jimmy, what is THE best Vitali's win. The most impressive against a top hof heavyweight in his prime.

    Don't answer me with some bull**** answer full of "facts" and domination stuff. I'm asking you, what is HIS best win. Yeah, Klitschko showed some impressive dominance, but when its against garbage opposition, it doesn't mean much to me.
    Originally posted by jimmy1569
    His best win is a cumulative take your pick... he's got 43 of them.. one more dominant than the other... being a smart a$$ & giving me the bs of what was his best win is left up to you utilyzing a negative opinion of all 43 different names he's beaten.. ofcourse,, yoiu're gerkoff response is going to put you in a position of power by claiming he's never beaten SOMEONE he's never faced before & that an out of shape Lewis tore up his face & gave him an L. mY ANSWER IS THAT HE BEATS WHO HAD THE BALLZ TO STEP IN THE RING WITH HIM.. since you guys automatically or practically give him a negative response when it comes to his comp & the fact that he never faced better comp is the reason he gets downgraded... i;ll be just as logical & state all the comp you think he hasn;t faced or beat were ducking him & too chicken shet to get in the ring with him... i'll use the same illogical responses you ALL use to discredit him & show & demonstrate to you what you're actually doing in the opposite form.. perhaps Only THEN YOU'LL GET it.. but i'm sure you never will.
    I don't know Mr. Cumulative, can you send me a highlights video of him ?

    Comment

    • Jcsuper
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2005
      • 2685
      • 200
      • 381
      • 9,253

      #82


      People always talk about how Vitali's was going to ko Lewis. But I see at 4min15 of this video is a guy taking a right hand to the rib and then a right hand to the head, holding for his life and taking an uppercut at the end of the round.

      Then coming f u cked up with his eye completely destroyed to his corner, spitting blood ( 4 min 55 ) and seem completely destroy, the doctor had no choice to end that fight.

      Fact : Tko 6, against a fighter that has never been so overweight in his professional career.

      Comment

      • JAB5239
        Dallas Cowboys
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 27963
        • 5,148
        • 4,464
        • 73,018

        #83
        Originally posted by jimmy1569
        Nope.... i'll have to get written affadivits that you're not all frontin' & actually believe all this factual data to be true.. at least .. at the very least you guys should admit he's been the most dominant as that's as given as Wilt Chamberlain was in the NBA back in the day. Admit that he's been the most dominant WITHOUT MENTIONING WORD OF HIS OPPONENTS & then i'll go easy on you's.. because that's the ONLY thing you all have to refute all this factual evidence.. let's just pretend his opponents are neutral. HAS he or has he NOT put up the best numbers of alltime? No excuses.. no nothing... just admit it.. you could say he's faced 45 cans for all i care.. just admit that he's made the MOST tomatoe paste out of them & then i'll believe you're not all hating for the sake of hating & aren't REALLY trashing his skills but are REALLY trashing his opponents.
        In that case....Vitaly is the big Ragu! The absolute king of destroying tomato cans! Now I prego you stop making your ******ed threads. Gratzie!!

        Comment

        • Superflo777
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2011
          • 1743
          • 68
          • 78
          • 8,312

          #84
          Originally posted by considerthis
          you forgot only "champion" to defend his "title" against a bum with 17 fights coming off a loss who lost 2 of his last 3.
          Explain to me why you put champion and title in commas. He completely destroyed and defeated both Hide and Peter, two legitimate champions. No vacant title on the line, no "regular" WBA title, but real HW world champions.

          Comment

          • shade darkar
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 6460
            • 227
            • 337
            • 12,996

            #85
            Originally posted by jimmy1569
            You still got jokes.. son.. after i ripped you a new one. OK.. you want an answer... his best win is the one a quack ringside doctor denied him. Second best win.. destruction of Corrie Sanders to restore family honor. Third best win was Sam Peter after a 4 year retirement due to injuries.. first person to stop the hard hitting Peter. 4th best win.. the destruction of Herbie Hide to win his first title.. 5th best win the total dismantling of Chris Areolla.. 6th best win the 3 minute destruction of Solis... 7th & most dominating W.. the complete devestation of Danny Williams.. 8th best win.. first person to destroy multiple champion Adamek.. 9th best win.. should be higher but i forgot.. the 2 rd destruction of kirk Johnson.. tenth best W NEARLY KILLING Shannon Briggs.


            There you have it.. i gave you the top ten... half of those fighters received there first knockout courtesy of him & the other half never got destroyed in that fashion before or after they faced Vitali.
            ripped me a new one?!!! hahaha everybody here thinks your a bit of a ****. actually scrap that, ****s are useful.

            so his best win is infact a loss?

            about time you got with reality.

            Comment

            • jimmy1569
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Aug 2005
              • 2920
              • 114
              • 0
              • 3,083

              #86
              Originally posted by shade darkar
              ripped me a new one?!!! hahaha everybody here thinks your a bit of a ****. actually scrap that, ****s are useful.

              so his best win is infact a loss?

              about time you got with reality.
              You guys are hopeless.. call peeps names... i'm not even catering to you as clientele.. but you keep showing up time & time again... you know why this is..i'll tell you why.. it;s because this forum is at least 80% anti-Klitschko. You hate them for all various reasons... but there's one REASON you hat them the most & that is the fact you ALL know.. no one on this freakin' planet right now can lay a hand on them & this irks you the most.. so all... all of you;s do is try to tear down there dominance.. by sheeting on ALL of there opponents & then claiming greats of the past were so much better.


              You think Vitali Klitschko WOULD BE CONCERNED facing anyone you deem is above him.. when he's the one with all the adavantages.. he's the one who's never been outslugged or outboxed... if it were that easy.. then every fighter would do it... that fact that he's the only one irks the very soul of your being... you ALL are lucky he has those injury defeats for you to claim a ***** in the armor.. just think if he had remained healthy for the duration of those bouts you'd all be staring at a fighter who's 45 - 0... on the verge of the best heavyweight winning % of alltime.. knockout % of alltime & scorecard % ever in the heavyweight division.....



              he's that close to the triple double of all trifectas.. it's such a thin line but this is what you'd be looking at with a injury & cut free Vitali Klitschko..... you'd still make up excuses because he's a big foreign giant & not one of us..... you're all a bunch of useless excuse making & disrespectful morons. well not all of yous.. there are a few good apples/

              Comment

              • jimmy1569
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2005
                • 2920
                • 114
                • 0
                • 3,083

                #87
                Originally posted by Jcsuper
                I don't know Mr. Cumulative, can you send me a highlights video of him ?
                Just go to the part of his bio where it says KO victims.. this is how he gets his wins.. 93% of the time.... that's Mr. Cumulative... tell him i sent you>>> moron!

                Comment

                • shade darkar
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 6460
                  • 227
                  • 337
                  • 12,996

                  #88
                  yawn.............

                  Comment

                  • JAB5239
                    Dallas Cowboys
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 27963
                    • 5,148
                    • 4,464
                    • 73,018

                    #89
                    Originally posted by Superflo777
                    Explain to me why you put champion and title in commas. He completely destroyed and defeated both Hide and Peter, two legitimate champions. No vacant title on the line, no "regular" WBA title, but real HW world champions.

                    Bro, these guys were paper titlists, thats it. We live in one world (well, some guys like Jimmy live in multiple worlds) and there can only be one WORLD CHAMPION. Those guys were not it, they were contenders at best.

                    Comment

                    • Superflo777
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Oct 2011
                      • 1743
                      • 68
                      • 78
                      • 8,312

                      #90
                      Originally posted by JAB5239

                      Bro, these guys were paper titlists, thats it. We live in one world (well, some guys like Jimmy live in multiple worlds) and there can only be one WORLD CHAMPION. Those guys were not it, they were contenders at best.
                      So you're saying if there's more than 1 champion out of 4 major sanctioning organizations, he's a paper champion? This would also account for all other weight classes, labelling Pac & Mayweather as paper champions. If you have a better explanation why they're paper champs, let's hear it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP