Can anyone in boxing history win a fire fight with Manny Pacquiao.

[NChristo]

He can, but thats not the point that I'm making. Pacquiao would have the power to KO Hearns.

Pacquiao is a big puncher and Hearns does not have an iron chin.

Cuevas had more then enough power to KO Hearns as well, so obviously Cuevas must be able too bea.... oh wait.

Is the only argument you're trying to make for Pacquaio beating Hearns' that Pacquaio is a hard puncher ?, because if so you are surely mistaken, you need more then a big punch to take down 147 Hearns.

Pacquiao has a better chin than Hearns

And Duran has a better chin than Pac.

[Vadrigar.]

If only Shane would have thought so himself, it could have been a great fight.

Better?

Not that Shane, he was 40.

[Light_Speed]

Think you are overating Hearn's chin.

Mosley has a better chin than Hearns and so does Cotto and both of them got put down.

Cotto has a better chin than Hearns?

[D4thincarnation]

Not that Shane, he was 40.

39.

It could have been his best chance of winning, but don't think he was interested in winning the fight.

[D4thincarnation]

Cotto has a better chin than Hearns?

Marginal but I would go with Cotto.

Hearns had terrible powers of recovery

[D4thincarnation]

Cuevas had more then enough power to KO Hearns as well, so obviously Cuevas must be able too bea.... oh wait.

Is the only argument you're trying to make for Pacquaio beating Hearns' that Pacquaio is a hard puncher ?, because if so you are surely mistaken, you need more then a big punch to take down 147 Hearns.


And Duran has a better chin than Pac.

Higher weight and Duran was past his best.

[NChristo]

Higher weight and Duran was past his best.

And ?, he still had a phenomenal chin but he was sparked out with a single right hand from Hearns' for the only time in his career, your ridiculous argument for Pac KO'ing Hearn's because De La Hoya and Mosley have better chins can easily be turned around, also are you saying that Hoya and Mosley weren't past their best vs Pac, the same way Duran was vs Hearns ?.

No one mentioned Arguello yet ?, he has a better chance of beating Pac toe to toe then Pryor (I think Pac is better then Pryor at mid range and he didn't do so well againt southpaws) and Taylor who'd both lose imo.

[dc3383]

And ?, he still had a phenomenal chin but he was sparked out with a single right hand from Hearns' for the only time in his career, your ridiculous argument for Pac KO'ing Hearn's because De La Hoya and Mosley have better chins can easily be turned around, also are you saying that Hoya and Mosley weren't past their best vs Pac, the same way Duran was vs Hearns ?.

No one mentioned Arguello yet ?, he has a better chance of beating Pac toe to toe then Pryor (I think Pac is better then Pryor at mid range and he didn't do so well againt southpaws) and Taylor who'd both lose imo.

Stop arguing with a idiot who think jabs don't count.

[ramses07]

Meldrick before Chavez wud tax that ass

[D4thincarnation]

And ?, he still had a phenomenal chin but he was sparked out with a single right hand from Hearns' for the only time in his career, your ridiculous argument for Pac KO'ing Hearn's because De La Hoya and Mosley have better chins can easily be turned around, also are you saying that Hoya and Mosley weren't past their best vs Pac, the same way Duran was vs Hearns ?.

No one mentioned Arguello yet ?, he has a better chance of beating Pac toe to toe then Pryor (I think Pac is better then Pryor at mid range and he didn't do so well againt southpaws) and Taylor who'd both lose imo.

Duran had taken a number of big blows and couldn't see the punches comming. The only reason why Hearns was able to load up like that.

And I never said Pacquiao would KO Hearns, I have only stated that Pacquiao has the power to KO hearns.