I don't think you need to prove a guy isn't shot. A fighter should be viewed as his usual self until people can prove that something has changed and he IS shot.
So until he can be proven shot with solid reasons, it does not make sense to just assume he is. Imo, against Pacquiao he did the same things he always does, and just as well as he always does. And despite taking solid shots, he was still coming forward and throwing strong punches into the 12th round.
So until he can be proven shot with solid reasons, it does not make sense to just assume he is. Imo, against Pacquiao he did the same things he always does, and just as well as he always does. And despite taking solid shots, he was still coming forward and throwing strong punches into the 12th round.
Comment