Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hatton: I Don't See How Pacquiao Can Beat Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Well this guy did fight both of these guys but him saying how he doesn't think Pac can beat Mayweather thats funny because Pacquiao put out his lights in two rounds while Mayweather did it ten. The Hatton vs Pac fight wasn't even a fight he lost the first round real bad kinda like Marquez did but Hatton didn't bounce back at all like Marquez did I think he's a little embarrassed about the way he lost to the Pac Man out in Las Vegas like Roy jones Jr did agains't Tarver. 2nd round Ko you gotta love them but styles make fights and thats way fighters fight and yes their could only be one Ricky Hatton the guy who retired Kostya Tszyo.

    Comment


    • Hatton got obliterated by Pacquiao in less than 3 rds yet almost lasted the distance with Floyd. Mosley and ODLH got shut down against Pac and appeared to do much better against Floyd....I'm seeing a pattern here.

      Comment


      • shut up soar looser! how many round did Floyd took to knock you out?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by mathed View Post
          Hatton got obliterated by Pacquiao in less than 3 rds yet almost lasted the distance with Floyd. Mosley and ODLH got shut down against Pac and appeared to do much better against Floyd....I'm seeing a pattern here.
          This argument makes no sense. It has been beat up to death. lol

          Comment


          • Originally posted by PACsmash View Post
            Yes Ricky, just like how u couldn't see manny beating u then he did but he just didn't whoop on u he sent u to bed way before ur bed time lol.
            didnt read what you said but that blunt looks awesome let me get it lol

            Comment


            • People just don't get it.

              Comment


              • the problem is, mayweather is still so scared to fight pacquiao...unless and until chicken floyd fight and beat pacquiao, floyd will always be chicken floyd and pacquiao will always be the biggest draw and the #1 p4p king...

                pacman announced he will fight chicken floyd anytime, anywhere...but chicken man is silent...

                for the *****s, why don't you exorcise chicken floyd of his fear for pacquiao...ask your man to fight pacquiao and end the debate of who's who...

                Comment


                • Originally posted by v.cassiusali@ya View Post
                  the problem is, mayweather is still so scared to fight pacquiao...unless and until chicken floyd fight and beat pacquiao, floyd will always be chicken floyd and pacquiao will always be the biggest draw and the #1 p4p king...

                  pacman announced he will fight chicken floyd anytime, anywhere...but chicken man is silent...

                  for the *****s, why don't you exorcise chicken floyd of his fear for pacquiao...ask your man to fight pacquiao and end the debate of who's who...
                  I'm not a "*****" but really? everything you said is wrong

                  You haven't heard all the Marquez IV talk have you?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by mathed View Post
                    Hatton got obliterated by Pacquiao in less than 3 rds yet almost lasted the distance with Floyd. Mosley and ODLH got shut down against Pac and appeared to do much better against Floyd....I'm seeing a pattern here.
                    That Pac fights Floyd's left overs? Or that Pac fights these guys when they are in the worst form ever? Think Ali Berkick? Is Berbick better than Frazier? Hell no, Berbick beat Ali at the end of his career. Now, what did Pac do vs beaten fighters like Hoya, Hatton, Clottey, Margarito, Mosley?

                    Same thing was supposed to happen with JMM but karma caught up to Pac. People need to learn that its not WHO Pac fought but WHEN Pac fought them. Again is Berbick better than Frazier? Nope, he just took advantage of an already beaten Ali who was washed up, just like most if not all of Pac's opposition has been since 2008.

                    Pac is still the same fighter he was then. With perfect match making and Bob Arum using the media to hype Pac, people bought into a product that was false and well... now that product has been proven to be a scam and all the Pac fans who talked **** about Mayweather now have their foot in their mouths..

                    The entire boxing community has been exposed to what Bob Arum's golden goose really is... The question remains if Koncz can talk dollars before sense to ol Bob so the fight will be made.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by WESS View Post
                      That Pac fights Floyd's left overs? Or that Pac fights these guys when they are in the worst form ever? Think Ali Berkick? Is Berbick better than Frazier? Hell no, Berbick beat Ali at the end of his career. Now, what did Pac do vs beaten fighters like Hoya, Hatton, Clottey, Margarito, Mosley?

                      Same thing was supposed to happen with JMM but karma caught up to Pac. People need to learn that its not WHO Pac fought but WHEN Pac fought them. Again is Berbick better than Frazier? Nope, he just took advantage of an already beaten Ali who was washed up, just like most if not all of Pac's opposition has been since 2008.

                      Pac is still the same fighter he was then. With perfect match making and Bob Arum using the media to hype Pac, people bought into a product that was false and well... now that product has been proven to be a scam and all the Pac fans who talked **** about Mayweather now have their foot in their mouths..

                      The entire boxing community has been exposed to what Bob Arum's golden goose really is... The question remains if Koncz can talk dollars before sense to ol Bob so the fight will be made.
                      Great post WESS, that is exactly what I have been trying to say.....

                      Originally posted by LeadUppercut View Post
                      Stop being so fkn gullible.

                      FACT: In order for a win to be significant, or to be genuinely regarded as "great", it would need to be an achievement that could not be matched by anybody else. If "anyone" could have beaten the guy, then how could the achievement be regarded as great?

                      NAME ONE FIGHTER THAT PACQUIAO BEAT WHO WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN BEATEN BY A NUMBER OF GUYS IN HIS OWN DIVISION.

                      Name just one.

                      Then tell me how the *** that makes Pacquiao " great " ?

                      Martinez, nobody at MW could have beaten Pavlik or Williams, they were #1 and #2 for a reason.

                      Diaz - anybody could have beaten him, get real.

                      Hoya - get real, that was an exhibition match and a total fkn joke. Old, shot, drained, shrink-wrapped, 145lb Hoya would have lost to EVERY top welter, MOST top jww's, and a number of lightweights. Even Marquez would have knocked him the *** out - get real.

                      Hatton - was never a top fighter, and he was a cracked egg when Pacquiao fought him. He was highly vulnerable, a number of jww's could have beaten Hatton when Pac fought him, as would a number of top lightweights, he struggled with Collazo, Urango, Lazcano, and had just had his clock cleaned by Mayweather - get real, Marquez would have killed him.

                      Cotto - had just been wrecked by Margarito and battered by Clottey. He was about 4th / 5th in the division at that stage, he was highly vulnerable and ripe for the picking, and..... Pac tried to drain him on the scales. Any of the top welters would have beaten that shot 145lb version of Cotto..... Marquez would have decisioned him easily.

                      Clottey - this bum is a perennial underachiever who has failed at every hurdle. He is a basic fighter with a limited skillset who for some strange reason chose not to fight back..... that fight was a sparring session designed to make Pacquiao look good, and anybody could pass that test.

                      Margarito - just *** off, that fight was disgusting. That fight was held for a jmw title, and yet Margarito was a faded welterweight bum who would have been beaten by EVERY top jmw, EVERY top welter, and anyone with good stamina/skills who uses movement - get real.

                      Mosley - Pacquiao ducked Mosley TWICE when Shane was ranked the #1 welter, and only decided to fight him after he suffered an ugly draw with Mora - SO GET REAL. Mosley had been exposed as shot and being unable to pull the trigger by Mayweather, and then uglied by Mora, he was clearly shot, and THE ENTIRE WORLD knew that he was shot and could no longer pull the trigger, which is the only reason why "padded" Pacquiao finally decided to fight him - get real.

                      There is nothing great about the "achievements" listed above, and Manny had certainly not achieved traditional greatness before the highly controversial win/loss to Marquez in 2008.

                      It is ABSOLUTELY FKN ABSURD to mention Pacquiao alongside greats like Moore, Duran, and Armstrong. Ridiculous fanboy ****.

                      One word..... HYPE-JOB !!
                      Now all of a sudden, a number of people agree with me. I see on YouTube a number of crusaders are starting to say the same thing, including trainers/fighters.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP