Comments Thread For: Hatton: I Don't See How Pacquiao Can Beat Mayweather

[LeadUppercut]

Promoter and former champion Ricky Hatton retired, at least from active fighting, earlier this year. Among his many wins, only two boxers were able to defeat him in the ring - Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather Jr. Speaking with the Daily Telegraph, Hatton discussed the outcome of a Mayweather vs. Pacquiao 2012 mega-match.

[Click Here To Read More]

Thats is actually pretty obvious Ricky, many knowledgeable fighters / posters have beaten you to that very same prediction.

And *******s, not only is this coming from a pro fighter, it is coming from a pro fighter who fought both of those guys.

[LeadUppercut]

All their common opponents (Hatton, Oscar, Mosley, and JMM) all pick Mayweather to beat Pacquiao, eat that s.hit up *******s.

Actually, _original_ speaks the truth.

Hatton, Oscar, Mosley, and Marquez, ALL stated that Mayweather will win.

[LeadUppercut]

in b4 foot stepping

*******: Hatton is a bum who dont know **** about boxing.

"well, then why should Pacquiao deserve any credit for beating him ?"

*******: ummm..... never mind

[LeadUppercut]

All of you saying Manny lost the last fight again move on dood its done Manny won that fight period!

No, Manny won that fight even though Marquez beat him.

Big difference there fanboy.

[Taaj Manzoor]

Between eating pies and drinking, Hatton does talk some sense.

[LeadUppercut]

Let floyd fight somebody else! All Pacquiao haters will just dream that Floyd beat Pacquiao. Yes! in your dreams!!! Let Floyd fight Marquez again. lol! Or Floyd vs Ortiz 2! Lol! Or yes! Guerrero because there are some confident on him beating Floyd.

Stop crying, its just one more loss.

Never mind that it was to a 38yo midget who was disadvantaged on the scales

[hugh grant]

Between eating pies and drinking, Hatton does talk some sense.

Well, before the JMM and Pac 3 fight, Hatton said it was a pick em fight between Floyd and Pac having fought both of them.

I think people are reading into the Pac and JMM fight too much and using it to decide what would happen between Floyd and Pac and you shouldnt really do.

If you make a prediction on FLoyd v Pac based on JMM and Pac you will come to the wrong conclusion.

[WESS]

"Top Rank lied a lot with Manny Pacquiao! He's not close to the fighter he pretends to be" - Sergio Martinez: On The Ropes Boxing Radio #151.

The entire boxing community has turned their backs on Bob Arum and Mr man Pac. Bob gave the perception that Pac is the next best thing to beat Mayweather.

Martinez is right, Bob lied to everyone. Pac is still the same fighter we all witnessed the last time he fought JMM. With perfect match making and marketing Bob created this hype machine out of Mayweather's shadow.

Even the *******s realize this. The boat is sinking. Lets all hope Koncz can talk to Bob into making the fight and putting dollars before sense.

[LeadUppercut]

When Pac was destroying everyone left right and centre for years and years, some deluded people said Pac couldnt beat Floyd and now there is even more ammunition.

The judges wont like what Floyd does against Pac, and will give Pac any decision.

" the judges..... will give Pac any decision "

You mean like they did with Marquez ?

Good luck with that result after Freddie throws in the towel around the 9th round.

[LeadUppercut]

JMM was a WINNER that night in the fact that no one gave him a chance. He did much better than expected. Pac was the LOSER that night, but only in the fact that he didnt perform like was expected of him.

Ummm..... who cares about that whiney ****.

Marquez won the fight, end of story.

Floyd wont get any decsion against Pac thats for sure. The judges will feel guilty for the decision they gave Floyd against Castillo

Because, they will be using the same judges as they did in the Castillo fight, correct? Or do judges collectively rule in hindsight?