Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vitali Klitschko has lost fewer rds than ANY boxing champion in the history of boxing

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by Superflo777 View Post
    Dumbest post of the thread.

    You do know or really should know that a 37 year-old (not 38) Lewis, coming off the Tyson win and saying he would keep on fighting for a long time, with Emanuel Steward in his corner, was losing every round against Vitali until he managed to luckily cause a cut. This doesn't give any indication of what a "prime" Lewis would have "done to him". This fight was no indication of the superiority of skill or talent of either fighter at all. Any Lewis-Vitali matchup is a 50/50 fight.

    Fact: Out of 45 opponents, no one has ever managed to dominate or outscore Vitali Klitschko, with only 2 men defeating him under lucky circumstances (Lewis) or with complete luck (Byrd).
    Thank you.. that prime ;Lewis would've ha nded Vitali his A$$$$$ when no one has EVER MANAGED to win more than 2 rds against him is pure & utter bollshet... it's ONLY wishful thinking to make up for how he stunk up the joint that night vs Vitali... if anything it showed how easily Vitali could outbox Lennox... landing about 60 more punches on him with half the bout being physically handicapped while his line of vision was being compromised... haters wake up & smell the coffee. Vitali OUTBOXES everyone & it's NOT even close.. so to wishfully think just because LL IS A few years younger or a measly 5 to 7 lbs lighter 60 more punches changes drastically... you're out of your ******** minds!

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by Fighting Pride View Post
      Cmon man, no other heavyweight had the ability to hit and not get hit as Vitali does. Part of the reason why the heavyweight division has been so loved throughout history is because the big guys had much less boxing skill than smaller fighters and fans knew they'd get exciting fights. It's hated now because skilful big guys like Vitali and Wlad are hence dominating, and Lewis before them didn't get much love either.
      guys like joe louis, jersey joe walcott, ali, holmes etc...were less skilled? don't think so. vitali was getting tuned up by corrie sanders so i guess he's the 2nd most skillfull heavyweight ever? of course no other heavyweight would ever be able to do what corrie sanders did.....even solis was outboxing him till his fat ass collapsed. the guy is slow and faster smaller guys would take advantage of that. these fat blobs are just sitting ducks with no speed, agility, or stamina. if joe louis fought primo carneras every fight he would look like god. it was more technical guys like schmelling, walcott and ezzard that gave him problems. you can't be a good technical fighter when you weigh 250 pounds and are 6'1-6'4.
      Last edited by daggum; 11-23-2011, 03:38 AM.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by #1Assassin View Post
        it speaks more for his lack of competition than anything. hes a consistent fighter dont get me wrong, but he only fought one great oponent in his entire career and got stopped.

        if any of the great HWs fought in this era they would be undefeated and have lost even less rounds. and btw i challenge the notion that vitali lost less rounds than any other champion, i think mayweather and pre HW RJJ both lost less rounds and thats just off the top of my head.
        Floyd has lost twice as many rds as Vitali Klitschko & that's being generous to Floyd. Rjj might've been dominant before he met up with TAR VER but he had about the same amount of fights as Vitali does now & i'm pretty certain he lost more than a few more rds than VK... HE WENT 12 rds so many times.. just like FLOYD.. they weren't all whitewashes... for example Vitali's been taken the distance 3 times & maybe lost 1 rd TOPS... i doubt both Floyd & RJJ didn't have off rds & one last thing we're talking career so let's NOT DISMISS the glasschinned version of RJJ who lost at least 4 rds collectively just by getting ktfo. & the tiebreaker if NEED BE WILL always be the stoppages.... there's a reason Vitali has the highest boxer efficiency rating in the entire history of the sport.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by Superflo777 View Post
          And he took it. Took it like only Vitali Klitschko could take it. Shows his greatness.

          Name any boxer that wouldn't have gone down from THAT punch exept for Vitali.
          They keep talking about the blind uppercut from close range.. The video clearly shows Vitali absorbing the shot just likes it's bouncing off his head as he immediately got back into normal fighting range & his head acting like a shock absorber..

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by daggum View Post
            he also has a sorry ass resume. he's lost to the 2 best heavyweights he's fought, he refuses to fight the best fighter in his division, most of his opponents are overweight blobs and he's only beaten 7 top 10 fighters in his entire career(compared to ali's 30) he would never even be champ in any other era because he's never beaten the best fighter in his division. he's just a product of this sorry 4 belt mismatch era.

            what's next? chris john is the greatest of all time? 45-0 baby!
            Bite me.... son!

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by jimmy1569 View Post
              Floyd has lost twice as many rds as Vitali Klitschko & that's being generous to Floyd. Rjj might've been dominant before he met up with TAR VER but he had about the same amount of fights as Vitali does now & i'm pretty certain he lost more than a few more rds than VK... HE WENT 12 rds so many times.. just like FLOYD.. they weren't all whitewashes... for example Vitali's been taken the distance 3 times & maybe lost 1 rd TOPS... i doubt both Floyd & RJJ didn't have off rds & one last thing we're talking career so let's NOT DISMISS the glasschinned version of RJJ who lost at least 4 rds collectively just by getting ktfo. & the tiebreaker if NEED BE WILL always be the stoppages.... there's a reason Vitali has the highest boxer efficiency rating in the entire history of the sport.
              yeah he's 40 years old and has fought mostly tomato cans. kimbo slice has the highest efficiency rating ever. he's never been hit and he's only thrown like 5 punches and scored 2 one punch ko's.

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by MASTERFUL View Post
                FACTS about Vitali Klitschko

                - WBC Heavyweight Champion of the world

                - All Time Great and Hall Of Famer

                - Has never truly lost

                - There is no blueprint to beat him

                - He is unbeatable

                - He is the most dominant fighter of all time

                - He has dominated every opponent he has ever faced

                - 45 have tried and 45 have been dominated

                - Has never been behind on the scorecards at the end of a fight

                - Has never been knocked down

                - He is the most intimidating HW of all time

                - Greatest Heavyweight Champ KO% of all time

                - Only man ever to be world heavyweight champ in boxing and kickboxing

                - Vitali is 40 and is still dominating. He hasn't lost a single round in his comeback.

                - Vitali beats any HW from any era.
                'nuff said.. we'll take that into court & get a guilty verdict everytime! This is all circumstantial evidence & not one single opinion was used without a fact to back it up.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by Fighting Pride View Post
                  His punch stats, punches landed to punches taken ratio are the greatest and most dominant of any heavyweight in history also.
                  Very observant of you... he wouldn't have all that scorecard domination if this little tidbit wasn't a factor.. THE haters got proof UP thaaaaaas from every conceivable angle & they treat his feats as if he's some Valuev clone.. ONLY MJ in bball had this much overwhelming evidence as he covered every aspect of the game so no one could possibly surpass him....the haters will have everyone think all these unprecedented factual data that ONLY He possesses is some kind of abberation.. the guy has no conceivable flaws.. it;s not like you're going to put him in with a george foreman or a sonny liston & find out he has a glass jaw.. he's got EVERYTHING covered.. his jaw is top 10 alltime... how does one expect him to lose without injury when EVERY aspect of winning boxing is in his favor & the most important one of all is that he;s got size & strength over most any fighter that's ever put or laced on the gloves.. it's pathetic that i even have to convince people when it's written in capital letters on the wall for everyone to see.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by Eagles View Post
                    People on here like to pretend Calzaghe and Vitali would be bums in any other eras which is far from the truth. Those people are serious haters.
                    Both know how to fight.. period.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by jimmy1569 View Post
                      'nuff said.. we'll take that into court & get a guilty verdict everytime! This is all circumstantial evidence & not one single opinion was used without a fact to back it up.
                      fact-ali beat 30 top 10 rated heavyweights
                      fact-vitali beat 7 top 10 rated heavyweights

                      fact-ali beat every heavyweight rated 1 or 2 between 1962-1877
                      fact-vitali is yet to beat the best guy in his division

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP