If Marquez beats Pacquiao, will you still be interested in Mayweather-Pacquiao?

[lest26]

in my opinion Marquez already beat Pac, he is the better boxer and if age aint caught up with him and the judges aint been payed off he can win and if he dose it dose devalue a Mayweather fight but not alot as many think, he lost too JMM already so id still want to see Pac fight Floyd, he is still a great boxer win lose or draw he will still be one of the best, too much emphasis is put on a loss, but its how you lose and how you come back after it that realy matters.

[Cash Cow]

in my opinion Marquez already beat Pac, he is the better boxer and if age aint caught up with him and the judges aint been payed off he can win and if he dose it dose devalue a Mayweather fight but not alot as many think, he lost too JMM already so id still want to see Pac fight Floyd, he is still a great boxer win lose or draw he will still be one of the best, too much emphasis is put on a loss, but its how you lose and how you come back after it that realy matters.

[WESS]

Just like I wanted to see Mayweather fight Judah after Judah lost to Baldo, I would still want to see Mayweather technically school Pac if Pac lost to JMM.

Ironically Mayweather was accused of ducking both Baldo and Judah who Mayweather eventually fought and beat.

Some things just never change.

[brick wall]

2009: Floyd Mayweather in his fight vs Juan Manuel Marquez threw 493 punches & landed 290!. Mayweather almost landed the same amount of shots on Marquez in one fight than Pacquiao landed in 24 rounds.[/I][/B]

damn what a surprising stats. what's more surprising is with so much punches landed by floyd, he only managed to inflict a few bruises in jmm's face. pac in both fights almost disfigured jmm's face.

[sdcluser]

why not? And if Pac beats Floyd, then the folks here will argue FOREVER who is "better" boxer.

[stickandmove12]

Finally someone making some sense. Even if you are a gayfish. Only joking. I know it was legal and everything, but something about Floyd putting the "old 1, 2" over on ortiz just doesn't sit right with me. Then the Hopkins-Dawson fiasco. I want to see a fight that goes the distance or a KO/TKO with no controversy. To answer the question I would still want to see pac-mayweather. It's a completely different fight than pac-marquez.

P.S. I want mayweather to lose so we can talk about something else.

[Come∂ian]

For sure people would still want to see it, because they have been pleading for it for ages, and if they dont fight, people will think all their pleas counted for nothing. But as for the credit Floyd will get, it will be considerably less as you can imagine.

As for Floyd landing so many punches. Shame he couldnt knock JMM down having landed so many punches. And i suppose its easier to land punches on someone who is bloated. Im suprised Floyd didnt land more than Pac.

[Kuyukut]

Mayweather needs to stop ducking Pacquiao. That's all I want to say...

[maguirre]

Pac losing to Marquez will add another excuse in Floyd's and his fanboys's long list. I think they will have the peace of mind they finally long for. It will be a sigh of relief.

:-)

[Johnwoo8686]

For sure people would still want to see it, because they have been pleading for it for ages, and if they dont fight, people will think all their pleas counted for nothing. But as for the credit Floyd will get, it will be considerably less as you can imagine.

As for Floyd landing so many punches. Shame he couldnt knock JMM down having landed so many punches. And i suppose its easier to land punches on someone who is bloated. Im suprised Floyd didnt land more than Pac.

What are you talking about? Floyd DID knock JMM down, didn't you see the second round of their fight? And Floyd landed nearly as many punches on JMM in one fight as Manny landed on JMM in two fights. Do you guys think before you post?