Klitschkos are the the best of this era

[Guest]

Lol, as usual Bozo stormed in and got all the attention for himself.

Yeah, exactly what I was saying. I've got no beef with the guy, but just ONCE it would be nice to see where a Big Klit converse would go without him directing it into the gutter.

[!!Captain]

Yeah, exactly what I was saying. I've got no beef with the guy, but just ONCE it would be nice to see where a Big Klit converse would go without him directing it into the gutter.

Even though I am VK's fan, I got no beef with him either. I find his posts funny at times and he's got some good analysis once in a while. It's when he starts bitching about "little crying girl Klit nuthugger", and gets personal, it gets tiring.

[Bozo_no no]

Sanders beat his brother. They have always avanged each other's loses.
Nothing wrong with that fight! He was fighting Sanders for the titl!

After Sanders beat Wladimir in 2 rounds, he was the BEST fighter to fight.

Sorry, don't see ANYTHING wrong with that fight!


Williams beat the so ighly regarded Tyson who was supposadly on his return path to clear out the division. After Williams beat THE MAN, he became the highly regarded as well. And what, Vitali beat him soundly as well! Sorry, see nothing wrong with that fight either!

You just keep proving my point. Is that why they call you Bozo here?

Thank You.

You, like the other nut huggers, love to kid yourselves.

Corrie Sanders was coming off a year's inactivity, was over weight, and was 38. And that's ON TOP of being a fringe contender.

Danny Williams has always been a choak artist, and again was another fringe contender.

And those are the only two fighters Vitali has fought in the last two years.

You haven't made a valid point yet.

Originally Posted by The Cooler
HAHAHA

This is some major Bozo Ownage!
Good Karma to the newbie! Great posts LOL

Could you be anymore pahtetic?

You Nut huggers are all the same. Some newbie comes in (that again may very well be someone like Nautilis with yet another account) and they spout the same tired defeated logic you've all tried before, and you fall all over eachother playing patty cake and giving high fives.

[Guest]

Even though I am VK's fan, I got no beef with him either. I find his posts funny at times and he's got some good analysis once in a while. It's when he starts bitching about "little crying girl Klit nuthugger", and gets personal, it gets tiring.

I agree there. Well, it's not even so much the fact that's it's personal, it's more the chokehold on a thread of this kind. Like you're not allowed to discuss Big Klit without Bozo stepping in.

Sometimes it's just like "Yeah, we get your point, but let someone else have a go, eh?"

[Bozo_no no]

Like you're not allowed to discuss Big Klit without Bozo stepping in.

That's because a discussion about Vitali can't take place without someone talking deluded non sense.

In the past, it was out of controll. Every weekend there would be a fight, and 3 or 4 "Yea but Klitschko would have..." threads would pop up.

I bring a much neeeded reality check, and as a result, the amount of flagrant and fanatical cheerleading is kept somewhat in check.

[Guest]

That's because a discussion about Vitali can't take place without someone talking deluded non sense.

In the past, it was out of controll. Every weekend there would be a fight, and 3 or 4 "Yea but Klitschko would have..." threads would pop up.

I bring a much neeeded reality check, and as a result, the amount of flagrant and fanatical cheerleading is kept somewhat in check.

I'm not saying I don't understand (or even agree) with what you're saying, but it would be interesting - just for once - to see what course these threads would take without you artificially steering it. After all, maybe ten pages in they'd all go "oh, actually - he ain't that good after all, is he?"

[BLOODSHED]

Thanks Bozo for bringing that reality check.

That's because a discussion about Vitali can't take place without someone talking deluded non sense.

In the past, it was out of controll. Every weekend there would be a fight, and 3 or 4 "Yea but Klitschko would have..." threads would pop up.

I bring a much neeeded reality check, and as a result, the amount of flagrant and fanatical cheerleading is kept somewhat in check.

[Bozo_no no]

I'm not saying I don't understand (or even agree) with what you're saying, but it would be interesting - just for once - to see what course these threads would take without you artificially steering it. After all, maybe ten pages in they'd all go "oh, actually - he ain't that good after all, is he?"

Are you kidding?

There's new threads monthly about how Wlad was drugged agasinst Brewster and how Vitali didn't really lose to Lennox Lewis.

They don't stop.

As a matter of fact, without the reality check, I'd fear it may turn into some kind of circle jerk.

[Guest]

Are you kidding?

There's new threads monthly about how Wlad was drugged agasinst Brewster and how Vitali didn't really lose to Lennox Lewis.

They don't stop.

As a matter of fact, without the reality check, I'd fear it may turn into some kind of circle jerk.

Yeah, but it's for the mods to dictate, surely?

90% of the time I ignore the threads. But occasionally - OCCASIONALLY, mind - I might like to join in and engage with what the poster is saying, no matter how "deluded". You're preventing my right from doing that.

[Bozo_no no]

Yeah, but it's for the mods to dictate, surely?

90% of the time I ignore the threads. But occasionally - OCCASIONALLY, mind - I might like to join in and engage with what the poster is saying, no matter how "deluded". You're preventing my right from doing that.

I don't plan on stopping dropping the reality checks when I see something I disagree with.

If you choose not to post because of that, that's your porogative.