Mike Tyson is the best

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • j
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2003
    • 4694
    • 210
    • 26
    • 11,831

    #51
    i just read the title, so i'll just say this: tyson was the best out the bunch of c and b class opponents he fought.

    i get the feeling that a lot of people say tyson is great because of his work against fighters like zouski, berbick, and biggs. i could name much worse opposition too.

    basically, i'm saying he looked outstanding against 3rd rate fighters. tillis gave him trouble, holmes was way out of it, ruddock gave him trouble, etc. a good fighter will look great vs subpar competition. but i've never really been impressed with his performances vs top fighters as in lewis and holyfield. not to mention getting beat by douglas, williams, and mcbride.

    Comment

    • Verstyle
      Future Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Aug 2005
      • 33130
      • 2,466
      • 3,248
      • 49,262

      #52
      Originally posted by j
      i just read the title, so i'll just say this: tyson was the best out the bunch of c and b class opponents he fought.

      i get the feeling that a lot of people say tyson is great because of his work against fighters like zouski, berbick, and biggs. i could name much worse opposition too.

      basically, i'm saying he looked outstanding against 3rd rate fighters. tillis gave him trouble, holmes was way out of it, ruddock gave him trouble, etc. a good fighter will look great vs subpar competition. but i've never really been impressed with his performances vs top fighters as in lewis and holyfield. not to mention getting beat by douglas, williams, and mcbride.

      if all this is so how come they dont talk about ppl that just beat bums in this forum and around the world. why is he the second if not first person every1 knows when they talk about boxing besides ali. i guess they give this reward to any "bum" so why is he the only "bum" being talked about then huh. i guess he didnt fight n e 1 that was 1st rated in your opinion. i guess back in the day they just gave WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP belts to any 1 that showed they can fight huh.

      Comment

      • butterfly1964
        The HW Sugar Ray!
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2005
        • 10615
        • 374
        • 233
        • 23,822

        #53
        tyson has no heart. he would have lost in his "prime" against holyfield and lewis anyway.

        Comment

        • The Infamous
          Banned
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Oct 2005
          • 370
          • 27
          • 8
          • 534

          #54
          Tyson was a myth. He would of folded against any decent competition that fights back.

          Comment

          • cwazz
            Up and Comer
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Oct 2005
            • 63
            • 3
            • 2
            • 6,332

            #55
            Both Hollyfield and Lewis beat Tyson in the amatures.

            Comment

            • Rockin'
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2004
              • 23910
              • 4,461
              • 12,395
              • 1,239,562

              #56
              Mike Tyson is damaged goods. He is done.

              Craig Payne beat Tyson in the amatuers aswell.

              Rockin'

              Comment

              • Verstyle
                Future Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Aug 2005
                • 33130
                • 2,466
                • 3,248
                • 49,262

                #57
                Originally posted by cwazz
                Both Hollyfield and Lewis beat Tyson in the amatures.

                thats a lie

                Comment

                • butterfly1964
                  The HW Sugar Ray!
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 10615
                  • 374
                  • 233
                  • 23,822

                  #58
                  Originally posted by mystyal2k5
                  if all this is so how come they dont talk about ppl that just beat bums in this forum and around the world. why is he the second if not first person every1 knows when they talk about boxing besides ali. i guess they give this reward to any "bum" so why is he the only "bum" being talked about then huh. i guess he didnt fight n e 1 that was 1st rated in your opinion. i guess back in the day they just gave WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP belts to any 1 that showed they can fight huh.
                  it doesn't matter if they talk about him alot. thew reason why they talk about him alot is because he is always raping women, biting someone's ear off, or threatening to eat someone's children. he is not talked about mainly for his boxing but mostly for his antics outside the ring.

                  Comment

                  • Mike Tyson Jr.
                    **** u til u luv me
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 2483
                    • 311
                    • 154
                    • 9,207

                    #59
                    Tyson is the greatest of all time

                    Comment

                    • butterfly1964
                      The HW Sugar Ray!
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Oct 2005
                      • 10615
                      • 374
                      • 233
                      • 23,822

                      #60
                      he is the greatest at laying flat on his back!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP