errrm.. So basically, your saying that if Tyson hadn't been mentally ****tarded he would definitely have been the unanimous and undeniable greatest of all time? Better than Ali?
Oh another thing I'd like to point out is that it's absolutely spasticated to penalise Tyson for losing to Williams and Mcbride. That's bull, because they were younger, and Tyson was basically about 40% of the fighter he was in '88.
wat? no1's saying hed b the best hw ever. but he would rule his era, and mayb have beaten lewis or holyfield.
Then why did you 3rd the statement that he was talented enough to be the greatest ever?
Unless you all misread. I said he didn't have the talent to be the best ever. I believe he definitely had the talent and potential to be the greatest of his era.
Geez some of you are trying to make it look like Tyson lost 20 fights in his career. ''He can one night beat a guy into a coma and the next night could get beaten into one himself by a lesser opponent'' How many times has that happened? Never in his prime but twice when he was young
All I meant by that was his prime didn't last long. He was imbalanced. He had mental problems. He was ****ed up. Holyfield himself said he wasn't fighting the Tyson of the 80s.
Comment