Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Un Deniable proof that Nevada allowed Floyd to win illegally

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by x3_bazooka_x3 View Post
    Care to debate this now.....

    Floyd could have hit him before the embrace, he chose not to, he baited this kid in, to ensure he was totally unsuspecting and defensless and nailed him, exactly what we see in your gifs, its clearly a foul according to Nevada...
    Good Morning everybody

    http://www.leg.state.nv.us/nac/NAC-467.html

    NAC 467.675 Acts constituting fouls in boxing. (NRS 467.030) The following acts constitute fouls in boxing:

    1. Hitting below the belt.

    2. Hitting an opponent who is down or is getting up after being down.

    3. Holding an opponent with one hand and hitting with the other.

    4. Holding or deliberately maintaining a clinch.

    5. Wrestling or kicking.

    6. If the referee has signaled that the opponent has been knocked out, striking an opponent who is helpless as a result of previous blows and so supported by the ropes that he does not fall.

    7. Butting with the head or shoulder or using the knee.

    8. Hitting with the open glove, the butt of the hand, the wrist or the elbow, and all backhand blows.

    9. Purposely going down without being hit.

    10. Striking deliberately at that part of the body over the kidneys.

    11. Deliberately using the rabbit punch.

    12. Jabbing the opponent’s eyes with the thumb of the glove.

    13. Using abusive language in the ring.

    14. Engaging in any unsportsmanlike trick or action which causes injury to an opponent.


    15. Hitting on the break.

    16. Hitting after the bell has sounded the end of the period of unarmed combat.

    17. Hitting an opponent whose head is between and outside of the ropes.

    18. Pushing an opponent about the ring or into the ropes.
    I think option #7 should've DQ'd the fighter first.

    /thread

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by 915angel View Post
      LISTEN TO YOUR SELF YOU SOUND ****** AT TS



      YOU GO ON AN ON BOUT FLOYD BREAKIN RULES AND POOR SPORTSMANSHIP

      BUT VICTORIA WAS CHEATIN FROM ROUND 1 HEADBUTTIN (you dont say **** about tht thts not good sportsmanship)

      you get whats you ask for he tried to fight dirty he got sum floyd kfc gave em tht two piece put him on his ***

      I cant help it if your hillbilly ass cant read, I stated Ortiz fought dirty no doubt, but it still does not change the rules, I dont expect your country bumpkin ass to understand that though

      Comment


      • #53
        im goin based off what i saw in this fight

        A ROOKIE VS A PRO (whos been dominatin the sport)

        wht yu tlkin bout star struck that only happens when i look in the mirror (;

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
          I think option #7 should've DQ'd the fighter first.

          /thread
          The ref felt that deducting a point would seve justice.... while they allowed Floyd to get away with a clear foul

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by x3_bazooka_x3 View Post
            Son let me be straight here, I have been on the forum voicing My opinion my take on this and questioned the legality of it all.
            The Floyd fans dismissed my post, wrote it off, justified Floyds tactics based on What Ortiz did.
            However I am going to provide proof when I say something, I am going to bring evidence, if I say something I have to back it up, it just took me a long time discussing the rules and collecting the information, I started with the executive director of the Associated Boxing Commission, from their unified rule book, to the federal rule book regarding the referees code of conduct all the way down to Nevadas rules.

            I am going to back up what I say, and why should anybody hate on that? How many people on these forums actually do that? and the only people who are hating on that, are people who are not fans of the sport, these people are star struck kids, who are stuck on one individual.

            I am not using this to justify what Ortiz did, again that as well is against the rules, what I am doing is simply turning on a light for those who do actually want to learn something.

            apparently most of the people here, are happy living in a bubble world.
            You are not some NSB superhero saving us from evil. You're a vigilante hater who believes he is doing good by steadfastly arguing floyd cheated. If you really love boxing, how about posting about it sometimes.

            Comment


            • #56
              "IF" your gonna talk dirt and be a net****er get ur facs right


              IMA ****** A NO GOOD MEXICAN




              yurr jus gettin mad cz you got ur *** handed to you IN YOUR OWN THREAD

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                I don't see where the "trick" part comes into play. It seems that Victor initiated touching gloves again. In the least, it seems mutual to me. They touch gloves and then Victor takes a step back with his hands down. Once he took that step back, he should have been ready to roll.

                This depends on what type of person you are, fan boy, or fan of the sport.
                When vic is approaching floyd that final time, Floyd with his hands up, Nods his head and leans in with vic, actually makes contact with vic as if to say okay okay, and then smack with the left hook.

                when fighters touch gloves or embrace like that, due to a foul, the ref knows and the fighters both know they are both to take one full step back and that didnt happen, Vic stepped back Floyd didnt.

                the post fight presser confirms this, as when Floyd was asked about it, he said what goes around comes around..... in other words admitting to fouling Ortiz.

                Comment


                • #58
                  im jus lookin after my *****s


                  ur the one gettin hurt emotionally i can sense ur hostility towards hillbillys and blacks racist

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by x3_bazooka_x3 View Post
                    The ref felt that deducting a point would seve justice.... while they allowed Floyd to get away with a clear foul
                    The ref that decided Ortiz shouldn't be disqualified for the head butt is the same one that decided Floyd did nothing wrong at the conclusion of the fight. It seems a bit skewed to accept his actions in one instance but not in the other.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by x3_bazooka_x3 View Post
                      The ref felt that deducting a point would seve justice.... while they allowed Floyd to get away with a clear foul
                      So wasn't Cortez wrong for not DQ'ing Ortiz after several warnings for headbutts?

                      If you're going to blame Cortez, why not create multiple threads blaming Cortez for not DQ'ing Ortiz for several blantant fouls instead of just deducting 1 point?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP