Un Deniable proof that Nevada allowed Floyd to win illegally
Collapse
-
Comment
-
TS is a moron, Floyd did not initiate the glove tap or hug, therefore there was no trick on his half, he took an advantage of seeing ortiz's hands down to hit him as retaliation, then after seeing Ortiz look at Cortez with his hands down decided to go for the kill, BLAME ORTIZ, and get a life.Comment
-
But he didn't "trick" Victor. It is plain to see he didn't try to hug. He even pushes Victor off as if to say "We're not hugging we're boxing".No they have a problem with me, and its not because I called out Floyds win, but I also backed it and supported it with the actual rules and that stings a bit more than just talking out the side of your neck they dont know how to address what I exposed rather make excuses for Floyd talk about the head buts while ignoring the elbows and the fact that the way he won was a foul.
in other words they were ****ing schooled, all these so called fans of the sport who sit back and say others dont know **** about boxing, were exposed to the harsh reality in ****ing with someone who knows a little bit about the sport, and that little bit I know is not so little compared to what these people here think they know 99% of them have never boxed how could they know the rules?Comment
-
Who the hell did you talk to at the WBC? The fact that you are going as far as to contact the WBC shows that you are not a boxing fan and just a FLoyd hater. Do you contact the sanctioning bodies when Wladimir Klitsckho uses his elbows, holds and hits, and uses excessive clenching? NO you don't.Actually The WBC also confirmed on the rule I posted and agrees with me but along with the WBC and my discussion with the executive director of the ABC they basicly state Nevada will prevail even though both agree that Floyd did in fact break that rule.
Now Ortiz did not use blatant fouls during the fight what you look at as head butts, you can see him driving his head into Floyds shoulder alot of agressive fighters do that to avoid being hit with the uppercut on the inside.
But also one more place Cortez ****ed up, When Ortiz did intentionally but Mayweather the rules state that 2 points are to be deducted per the WBC that didnt happen why?
Perhaps these guys do not know all the ****in rules or do not think on the fly as they should.
Also note that Cortez lost his mother the same day of the fight, you think Nevada is going to come down on him for his **** ups? Kizer and Bayless are co workers and likely felt bad for Joe, and Nevada has already come under fire from the Agbeko Mares fight, I mean just how competent are these "Officials"
and since Nevada is right in your mind, explain to me what the rules state regarding a cornerman entering the ring during the contest? whats supposed to happen?
Why didnt it happen? perhaps the resident of that state is getting a little bit of home cooking
If the commission and the referee agree Floyd did nothing wrong then Floyd did nothing wrong. Also, explain to me at what point did Floyd supposedly "trick" Ortiz? I'll wait
Comment
-
ill tell you why it failed you f4ggot of exponential powers...oooh big letters uh oh!
how has his thread failed if the rules say no unsportsmanlike tricks and you can clearly see Floyd doing exactly that?
"Well the NAC said no foul" pfft big deal commissions go against their own rules all the time, and this is Vegas we are talking about here.
THE CONTEST WAS RULED A KO 4.... THIS GUY IS STILL HERE 50 PAGES AFTER TRYING TO JUSTIFY HIMSELF USING A *****TY ONE-LINER 'RULE' WITHOUT FURTHER DEFINITION
FAIL THREADComment
-
Actually The WBC also confirmed on the rule I posted and agrees with me but along with the WBC and my discussion with the executive director of the ABC they basicly state Nevada will prevail even though both agree that Floyd did in fact break that rule.
Now Ortiz did not use blatant fouls during the fight what you look at as head butts, you can see him driving his head into Floyds shoulder alot of agressive fighters do that to avoid being hit with the uppercut on the inside.
But also one more place Cortez ****ed up, When Ortiz did intentionally but Mayweather the rules state that 2 points are to be deducted per the WBC that didnt happen why?
Perhaps these guys do not know all the ****in rules or do not think on the fly as they should.
Also note that Cortez lost his mother the same day of the fight, you think Nevada is going to come down on him for his **** ups? Kizer and Bayless are co workers and likely felt bad for Joe, and Nevada has already come under fire from the Agbeko Mares fight, I mean just how competent are these "Officials"
and since Nevada is right in your mind, explain to me what the rules state regarding a cornerman entering the ring during the contest? whats supposed to happen?
Why didnt it happen? perhaps the resident of that state is getting a little bit of home cooking
All of your questions have already been answered by me; see my past threads on the issue. I don't care to repeat myself for such an unworthy opponent.
I just realized something. I'm sitting here messing with a guy who's obviously mentally unstable and has to get counseling from a guy name TheFrog.
Case closed.Comment
-
Then why did he wait and allow him knowing Victor was comming to apologize he should have hit him before he got that close he did trick him only Floyalist think other wiseComment
-
I ran the vice chairmans boxing club for a few years so I know people who work for the WBC.Who the hell did you talk to at the WBC? The fact that you are going as far as to contact the WBC shows that you are not a boxing fan and just a FLoyd hater. Do you contact the sanctioning bodies when Wladimir Klitsckho uses his elbows, holds and hits, and uses excessive clenching? NO you don't.
If the commission and the referee agree Floyd did nothing wrong then Floyd did nothing wrong. Also, explain to me at what point did Floyd supposedly "trick" Ortiz? I'll wait
and whats the klitschkos got to do with this? or are you making this about race? I have also alread in the video pointed out where his trick came into play I aint repeating myself a million times you wan to see my argument refer to the rules and the videoComment

Comment