Un Deniable proof that Nevada allowed Floyd to win illegally

[MJ223]

Hey fellas its a Joe Frazier appreciation thread in NSB and I would greatly appreciate it if you guys stopped by.

[.::|ULTIMATE|::.]

Undeniable Proof?

You don't need rules for that....


Castillo got robbed in his fight with him.

Hatton was elbowed to death and pretty much ended his career

Cortez was allowed to referee an important fight with Ortiz after being demoted for a while.

No more proof is necessary.

Floyds record should have a 1 in the losses column at least.

[BoxingGenius27]

Then bring that **** with you if you think you can get me that way, I wouldnt give a **** you talk big bring that **** with you, and for someone who says they a grown man mother ****er you sure act more like a little B1tch than anything.

all but hurt because the majority didnt agree with you this morning and you want to take cheap shots at me as a result of you owning yourself.

and you expect me to think your a grown man, be ****ing real son

No need for me to physically get you little man. You're obviously not under my skin like I am yours, little boy.

The only time I punch someone in the face is when I have too and when I'm mentally defeated and have no other options. I think the last time that happened was probably about 7 years ago.

Anyway, weren't you calling up NSAC to dispute Mayweather's win over Ortiz. How'd that go for ya?

[LatinKing416]

Well that's cause that's what is written in the official rule book complete with definitions. If it's not enough for you then you have a problem with the Nevada State Athletic Commission not the OP

you ****ing moron... i dont have a problem with them, bazooka does.... thats why hes been crying on this thread for 50 pages


NSAC saw it as a legal KO... even keith ****ing kizer didnt have a problem with it

thats why everyone is *****tin on this idiot



and he still has no clue how to respond

[x3_bazooka_x3]

Well that's cause that's what is written in the official rule book complete with definitions. If it's not enough for you then you have a problem with the Nevada State Athletic Commission not the OP

No they have a problem with me, and its not because I called out Floyds win, but I also backed it and supported it with the actual rules and that stings a bit more than just talking out the side of your neck they dont know how to address what I exposed rather make excuses for Floyd talk about the head buts while ignoring the elbows and the fact that the way he won was a foul.

in other words they were ****ing schooled, all these so called fans of the sport who sit back and say others dont know **** about boxing, were exposed to the harsh reality in ****ing with someone who knows a little bit about the sport, and that little bit I know is not so little compared to what these people here think they know 99% of them have never boxed how could they know the rules?

[BoxingGenius27]

Hey man don't turn it into something like this. I'm sure there are a bunch of us who all think we could knock eachother out but lets stick to the topic so that they can continue to look ******.

He's obviously a weak minded clown. He has no choice lol.

[x3_bazooka_x3]

Hey fellas its a Joe Frazier appreciation thread in NSB and I would greatly appreciate it if you guys stopped by.

Sorry man I dont wan to do that just yet the man still has a fighting chance I dont wan to act like he is gone now

[BoxingGenius27]

No they have a problem with me, and its not because I called out Floyds win, but I also backed it and supported it with the actual rules and that stings a bit more than just talking out the side of your neck they dont know how to address what I exposed rather make excuses for Floyd talk about the head buts while ignoring the elbows and the fact that the way he won was a foul.

in other words they were ****ing schooled, all these so called fans of the sport who sit back and say others dont know **** about boxing, were exposed to the harsh reality in ****ing with someone who knows a little bit about the sport, and that little bit I know is not so little compared to what these people here think they know 99% of them have never boxed how could they know the rules?

Wait a minute.

I thought you said that if 95% of the thread disagreed with the TS, then that made TS wrong.

You've already admitted to defeat clownzooka. Now get over it little boy.

[x3_bazooka_x3]

Hey man don't turn it into something like this. I'm sure there are a bunch of us who all think we could knock eachother out but lets stick to the topic so that they can continue to look ******.

I hear what your saying, However this cat here has been all over my youtube channel talkin **** about my son I had to ignore him from youtube might do the same here

[TheFrog]

you ****ing moron... i dont have a problem with them, bazooka does.... thats why hes been crying on this thread for 50 pages


NSAC saw it as a legal KO... even keith ****ing kizer didnt have a problem with it

thats why everyone is *****tin on this idiot



and he still has no clue how to respond

I mean the way it's written. Boxing commissions go against there own rules all the time which is a big reason why the sport is as corrupt as it is.

The rule is "Acts Constituting a Fowl" the OP posted the definition that is given by NAC. You guys are asking for a definition of the definition. It shouldn't take 50 pages to get something so basic through your head.