Barrera Vs Chavez is signed, no Barros fight!

[oldgringo]

Flyyy you're way off base here man. A fight can be competitive without being close on the cards.

The Augustus/Mayweather was compeitive too, but it wasn't close on the cards or anything.

[xzworks]

wer the hell is xx,usa?

[BLOODSHED]

Would you call a basketball game thats spread is 40 points competitive if the losing team made every three pointer they took? No, they're still losing by 40 points.

Flyyy you're way off base here man. A fight can be competitive without being close.

The Augustus/Mayweather was compeitive too, but it wasn't close on the cards or anything.

[Bozo_no no]

The judges and I both had Toney beating Jirov by a comfortable margin too. Would you say that Toney DOMINATED that fight or would you say that Jirov WAS NOT competitive?

Excellent example, I was thinking of that fight just before I read your post.

Toney dominated the scoring, but the actual fight was very competitive and hard fought.

No... anybody can throw 100 punches in a round man. Chavez wasn't accurate at all and was getting tagged. Just because he threw 100 punches a round doesnt A) make him top notch B) make him good C) make it competitive. You have to do "effective aggression" like Castillo. Put in the Castillo-Mayweather I fight.

Chavez landed just 10 total shots less than Floyd.

You said it was a blow out, not competitive, and like the Gatti fight.

That couldn't be a poorer take on that fight.

I just watched this fight again yesterday, and made a thread about it.

It was a clear win for Floyd, but Chavez made it a tough one. It was compeitive the whole way through.

[Kimmy]

Flyyy you're way off base here man. A fight can be competitive without being close.

The Augustus/Mayweather was compeitive too, but it wasn't close on the cards or anything.

Many fights have been competitive and in the end one fighter wins by a landslide on points. Thats how many fighters who lose allot still get big fights regardless because they put up a great effort. Look at Gatti, he lost to Robinson twice on the trot and still got big fights.

[Easy-E]

Would you call a basketball game thats spread is 40 points competitive if the losing team made every three pointer they took? No, they're still losing by 40 points.

that is perhaps the worst analogy ever

heres one.
is a basketball series competitive if one team sweeps the other even if they won each game by three points

[oldgringo]

The CWS/Stros game is a good example.

Every game was decided by 1 or 2 runs...coming down to the 9th inning every time. The Sox still swept the series though.

Flyyy I don't think me, bozo, PBF(who is a big Mayweather guy I believe), kimmy, etc are all incorrect here.

[BLOODSHED]

Im a big Mayweather fan too but a guy has to do more than throw a lot of punches. He has to land. Chavez didnt land and his corner called the fight OFF because their fighter didnt want to be embarassed any more on TV. Thats why Corrales', Chavez and Gatti's corner gave up and threw in the towel.

[BLOODSHED]

Prolly through 2 1/2 times as many punches too.

Chavez landed just 10 total shots less than Floyd.

You said it was a blow out, not competitive, and like the Gatti fight.

That couldn't be a poorer take on that fight.

I just watched this fight again yesterday, and made a thread about it.

It was a clear win for Floyd, but Chavez made it a tough one. It was compeitive the whole way through.

[oldgringo]

Im a big Mayweather fan too but a guy has to do more than throw a lot of punches. He has to land. Chavez didnt land and his corner called the fight OFF because their fighter didnt want to be embarassed any more on TV. Thats why Corrales', Chavez and Gatti's corner gave up and threw in the towel.

who is in your sig?