Larry's take on the Martinez-Barker fight
Collapse
-
Barker undefeated good fighter with a good technique that got knocked out
Clottey....defeated by Cotto, Margarito and did horribly against Pacquiao yet still managed to bust Pacquiaos face up...
I was more impressed with Barker tbhComment
-
true but im giving you the biggest difrence btween both fights which was " the pac vs clootey fight was oneside and the sergio vs barker fight was competitive....not to mention barker is a no namer and unranked....Comment
-
so barker is a good fighter now jst coz he gave sergio problems?....GTFOH with that BS...Comment
-
I think the more apt comparison is Amir Khan vs Paul Mccloskey. Except Barker put in more effort than Mccloskey.Comment
-
Comment
-
people talking bout a busted nose???a 10 year old can hit you in the nose and bust your damn nose..thats the easiest thing to doComment
-
excuses excuses....barker is a bum and he was competitive vs sergio...that means that sergio has always been overrated....that is why he is ducking fighting the other best mw 's out there.....
****, if he was fighting andy lee in there , i think he would've gotten exposed.....sergio aint that good homie!Comment
-
clottey was a world champ and both his losses to cotto and margarito were razor thin. he proved he belonged at the top. barker was undefeated but he fought no one and that's more impressive? his technique is good? he barely landed anything on martinez. clottey was able to land on cotto, margarito, judah, and pac he just wasn't consistent enough. not to mention his defense is much better than barkers.Comment
Comment